M
Mimic
Onideus said:Obvious you're not up on places like UltraShock.
Who can't even build a liquid text site? *snicker* Apparently the
"*REAL* world" is a few shades deficient from "wally wally land" where
we consider people like Brian Zick to be "highly acclaimed web
architects": http://www.brianzick.com/
LOL. If thats what the people of wally wally land consider "highly
acclaimed", then theres your problem. You need to get the **** out of
wally wally land.
That static 1024x768 layout is all about "usable and accessible" is
it? LOL, I remember when you stupid bitches acted like the whole
fuckin WORLD was gonna end when I did a static 1024x786 layout on the
NP Index site...now these stupid bitches do it and it's all "okay"
because they're "*REAL* world" "highly acclaimed web architects".
*snicker*
Apparently "highly acclaimed" means you can pretty much do an absolute
shit job and morons like Mimic will still be singin yer
praises...yeah, remind me not to ever gain THAT status...*shudder*...
...that site really isn't that visually appealing. In fact it's a
very minimalist design, meaning it's supposed to be more functional
than visually appealing.
And what a bang up job they're doing of "guiding the industry on web
standards"...you know, what with how NO WEB BROWSER IN EXISTENCE
actually meets those standards...which is sorta interesting when you
consider that the peeps who make up the W3C are corporations like
Microsoft, Mozilla, etc, etc. I mean, they're setting standards that
even THEY don't meet...yeah, think about it. You got lied to, Bitch.
A "world renowned emag", eh? ROTFL...yeah, sure kid, sure. I don't
think ANY "emag" could be considered "world renowned".
...so have quite literarily hundreds of thousands of other assholes.
Oh hey, just what we need, ANOTHER group of assholes who thinks they
should be the ones setting the "standards".
Uh huh, sure kid. All I'm seein is that the same stuff I was doing
TWO YEARS ago that you were bitching incessantly about is suddenly
bein slurped up by all you deficient little assholes. Apparently that
means that *I* set the standards and you stupid bitches are just two
years out of date.
Of course it's not, I mean it requires a shit load of skill to be able
to use say Flash in a manner that's as productive as deficiently
easier alternatives (which aren't as cross browser compatible, cross
platform compatible or cross resolution compatible). There are really
only a handful of people on the entire fuckin planet who even have
that level of skill. Because of that, no, it's not something that's
going to be implemented by every stupid jackass who runs around the
net claiming to be a "world renown web architect".
Actually no, Stupid. The "Flash craze" as you call it from the "LAST
CENTURY" was all about using Flash from an animation
perspective...however recently Flash has gone from something that used
to only be good for animation to an incredibly powerful web
development tool...of course, like I said, it ain't easy (yet) which
is why the stupid deficient bitches like you haven't all jumped on the
new Flash bandwagon. But hey, I give ya morons two years, I'm sure
Flash related app makers will have made it real cookie cutter for you
drooling retards by then.
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
This post doesnt really need any reply. In one stack of lines, youve
manage to prove how much of a fool you are. How little knowledge you
actually have. And before you moan about proof and arguments, I dont
need to, because EVERYONE else knows what you just said is a load of
bollox, so the only person I would be educating would be you, and we all
know that you never listen - hence no need to back anything up.
--
Mimic
"The man who awaits the rising of the sun, cannot wait forever."
[email: ZGF0YWZsZXhAY2FubmFiaXNtYWlsLmNvbQ==]
Help Stop Spam - www.hidemyemail.net