Are there any differences between 'Synplicity VHDL compiler, v1.0, b. 074R' and GHDL compiler?

[Merciadri Luca]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Are there any differences between 'Synplicity VHDL compiler, v1.0,
b. 074R' and GHDL compiler?

Thanks.
- --
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
- --

When making your choices in life, do not forget to live. (Samuel
Johnson)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iEYEARECAAYFAky1gysACgkQM0LLzLt8Mhw6CwCfZET0USUWaW3NV2oCDoFMLwat
/OsAn1Yu0QL668QAuAHHoQkveFIkW3dr
=a9BT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

 

[backhus]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Are there any differences between 'Synplicity VHDL compiler, v1.0,
b. 074R' and GHDL compiler?

Thanks.
- --
Merciadri Luca
Seehttp://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
- --

When making your choices in life, do not forget to live. (Samuel
 Johnson)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iEYEARECAAYFAky1gysACgkQM0LLzLt8Mhw6CwCfZET0USUWaW3NV2oCDoFMLwat
/OsAn1Yu0QL668QAuAHHoQkveFIkW3dr
=a9BT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Hi,
Synplicity(now owned by Synopsys) tools (namely Synplify) are for
synthesis. They have a comercial license.
GHDL is an open source simulation tool.

Have a nice synthesis
Eilert

 

[Merciadri Luca]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,
Synplicity(now owned by Synopsys) tools (namely Synplify) are for
synthesis. They have a comercial license.
GHDL is an open source simulation tool.

Yes, but do they do the same things? Is one more limited than another?

Have a nice synthesis

Thanks!

- --
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
- --
- --

You cannot escape the responsibility of tomorrow by evading it
today. (Abraham Lincoln)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iEYEARECAAYFAky2raQACgkQM0LLzLt8MhxFIwCgkAwB6sjJHiXH6kN49j0uQPFb
uJMAn1nsFLoNEybh5Ji/9A3tAwOXDMwa
=oAwG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

 

[Chris Higgs]

Yes, but do they do the same things? Is one more limited than another?

They will certainly be different. Finding out what the specific
differences, limitations and bugs are may be near impossible though!

In theory the VHDL LRM (Language Reference Manual) provides sufficient
information for all compilers to behave identically (assuming they are
LRM compliant) regardless of the underlying implementation details.
Tool vendors will usually claim compliance to a particular version of
the standard with certain exceptions. AFAIK no tool vendors fully
support VHDL-2008 yet.

In practice, you will find that certain tools require work-arounds to
navigate deficiencies and bugs. The way the Xilinx tools handle
libraries and record types appears to be a poorly executed
afterthought, though the new parser improves matters slightly. All
tools have their own niggles and foibles to discover - not always a
fun experience.

Chris

 

[KJ]

Hi,

Yes, but do they do the same things? Is one more limited than another?

Perhaps take 30 minutes and read up about what the different tools
do. One hint: Synplify and GHDL perform completely different tasks.
The only common element is that the input is VHDL.

KJ

 

[Merciadri Luca]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thanks for both messages. I will take a deeper look into this when
I'll have spare time.

- --
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
- --

When love and skill work together, expect a masterpiece. (John
Ruskin)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iEYEARECAAYFAky3arMACgkQM0LLzLt8MhwJygCgnL6gBpJcyWEWntM3HinGKxH+
5skAn3CTFAwSSCMiL2tWyALAFb5gJ7hK
=p41Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----