R
rakeshsv
Please help
Guys - Why java is implemented in stack ?
Rakesh
Guys - Why java is implemented in stack ?
Rakesh
Please help
Guys - Why java is implemented in stack ?
Guys is a gender neutral term when used by young Australians orEric Sosman said:P.S.: Some of the best help you'll find around
here doesn't come from "guys."
David said:Guys is a gender neutral term when used by young Australians or
residents of the northern United States. It seems that Southerners use
"y'all" instead. <http://research.umbc.edu/~korenman/wmst/guys.html>
Why java [sic] is implemented in stack ?
Is there a term for "not Southern States"? I thought of using YankeesLew said:Not just northern U.S. I believe it's popular on the West Coast, too.
Guys is a gender neutral term when used by young Australians or
residents of the northern United States. It seems that Southerners use
"y'all" instead. <http://research.umbc.edu/~korenman/wmst/guys.html>
Lew said:Not just northern U.S. I believe it's popular on the West Coast, too.
Lew said:David said:Guys is a gender neutral term when used by young Australians or
residents of the northern United States. It seems that Southerners use
"y'all" instead. <http://research.umbc.edu/~korenman/wmst/guys.html>
Not just northern U.S. I believe it's popular on the West Coast, too.
Regardless, the question makes no sense to me.
Why java [sic] is implemented in stack ?
What do you mean, exactly? I do not understand the phrase "implemented
in stack" in this context.
Certainly, the Java language, like every computer language I've heard
of, uses stack structures to implement some of its activities. It also
uses heap, sticking with the memory world.
Are you asking why the Java Virtual Machine uses the stack for certain
things? For the same reason every other computer language does, it's
convenient and fast for certain things. (Which, in turn, is why
computers have a stack in the first place.)
I'll ignore the gross change of context and remind you that I did sayEric Sosman said:David Segall wrote On 04/25/07 02:23,:
Please explain the gender-neutrality of "Guys and Dolls."
I'll ignore the gross change of context and remind you that I did say
young ... Frank Loesser would be 97 and Damon Runyan 122
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.