If the OP feels the need to post two copies (almost) of a message, one
can reasonably expect that he will look for answers to both. Especially
in this case, where it's obvious that it's not an error.
The OP could have put his questions in one post. Much more convenient for
everyone. You could have pointed that out to him.
And anyway, why does it matter to you?
I read it! I care. Whatever. I don't like my Usenet cluttered up with this
repeating copies of messages, and undoubtedly many others feel the same way,
now and until the end of the last Usenet archive.
Their original purpose is extremely relevant to explain why they look
like they do, and why the developer has almost no way to modify them or
make them look better.
Sure, it is relevant to explain those things. But when deciding on a way to
communicate with visitors to a webpage, the only things that count are
current things. Not original purposes. Just like the web's original purpose
was never anything pornographic or even commercial... From your words I get
the feeling that you find it wrong to use alerts and prompts in real-life
situations with real-life users, merely because of this original purpose. I
really don't follow, can't see any logic in that.