Examples of Websites and Graphic Art created by Children

R

rf

<posting from alt.html>

Either of two, you're not blind or you don't have any consideration
for real blind people.

I let you out of my killfile for a few minutes and this is what rubbish
appears.

First of all, Chaddy is legally blind. That does not mean his eyes do not
work at all, just that his sight is impared such that he is not legally
obliged to actually see things. You should read up on the legislation in
your own country and in ours (Australia) before casting such black and white
assertions. Then again don't, you probably would not understand it anyway.

Chaddy's visual acuity is not good but is enough to see his screen in
general and to have a feel about what is hapenning on it. It's like looking
through some translucant showerscreen glass I believe (Is that right
Chaddy?). Chaddy uses assistive technology to respond in this and many other
newsgroups, one of the reasons his spelling is so bad :) but we who know
him do not care about this and even enjoy and joke about it, and I am sure
Chaddy enjoys the odd such joke.

So, Chaddy is quite well (and mind you blindness, or rather visual
imparment, or whatever Chaddy likes to call his, is not an illness) able to
produce web sites. I have followed his main web site for several years and
find it to be an inspiration. We, who know him, offer critical (in the true
sense of the word, constructructively critical) advice and he is pleased by
this. Chaddy also often offers some rather critical advice to others,
particularly from his visual viewpoint. For this we are gratefull and we
learn from this. I am sure the recipients of that advice are also gratefull.
It is good to hear what ones web site looks like, and operates like, to
someone like Chaddy.

I have not viewed any of his flash work, as I don't do flash, but I expect
it to be a similar standard.

As to Spheric, aka Trevor, who used to go by another handle, I have seen him
here as well for a long time, prior to his hiatus. While I do not interact
much with him, other than to note his designs go by from time to time (with
the odd critique from myself and, of course Chaddy) I respect him as a
contributor to this newsgroup, and others.

Now, as to you.

After having a bit of a run-in with Chaddy (which I still have not found,
but I suspect it was just Chaddy stating (as we all do) that your sites
suck) and having your balls chopped off my just about everybody who matters
to the "regulars" in this group you start off a thread likening Chaddys work
to that of how many children. I have just looked at some of these sites (for
the first time) and I am willing to say that some of them look OK. Some of
them are actually quite good, visually. Many however do not look OK. None of
them are up to the standard required by this group and none of them, as far
as I can tell, are up to the professional standard exhibited by Chaddy,
Trevor, or any of the other "regulars" in this group, especially in regard
to (funnily enough) accessibility.

<aside>
I just visited every site you offered up.

Every one of them fails in some way. Images of test. "Click here". Flags
indicating countries. Fixed width. All of the things this and other
newsgroups would frown upon.
</aside>

When Chaddys situation was revealed to you you called yourself a bloody
arsehole and indicated you would not return.

You lied. You are still here. You are still attacking people whom you know
exactly nothing about except from what you may discern from their posts
here. Without knowing anything else about them.

You truly are a bloody arsehole. One usenet would be better off without.

Note: You will not get me into a Stukle pissing contest over this. Blather
away. I am listening with beer in hand waiting for your next out of your
arse statement.

Have a good rest of your life.
 
J

Jerry Stuckle

1001 said:
Who are "we"?
Who is "Ahmed"?
Who is "mommy"?

Please Jerry, pay attention to me for a second.
Seek medical help, NOW !!!
You are potentially dangerous to people around you.
You should be put away, specially when taken also into account your
CRIMINAL record.

ROFLMAO,! Oh, Ahmed, you think we're so dumb. But the only stoopid one
here is you! And you make a lousy liar.

Or maybe we should let the rest of the world know you live at 35 Avda
America in Madrid, Spain.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
(e-mail address removed)
==================
 
A

Andy Dingley

ROFLMAO,! Oh, Ahmed, you think we're so dumb. But the only stoopid one
here is you! And you make a lousy liar.

Or maybe we should let the rest of the world know you live at [...]

Jerry, what's the purpose in your deliberate trolling here?

Because when it comes to posting people's addresses all over the
place, that's indefensible trolling regardless of who does it, or who
they do it to.
 
J

Jerry Stuckle

Andy said:
ROFLMAO,! Oh, Ahmed, you think we're so dumb. But the only stoopid one
here is you! And you make a lousy liar.

Or maybe we should let the rest of the world know you live at [...]

Jerry, what's the purpose in your deliberate trolling here?

Because when it comes to posting people's addresses all over the
place, that's indefensible trolling regardless of who does it, or who
they do it to.

Andy, just letting him know he isn't as anonymous as he thinks he is.
He thinks he can fool us by lying about his name. But that's not all
that's known about him.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
(e-mail address removed)
==================
 
1

1001 Webs

<posting from alt.html>




I let you out of my killfile for a few minutes and this is what rubbish
appears.
Sure.
It suits you just right to start your reply with a lie.
First of all, Chaddy is legally blind. That does not mean his eyes do not
work at all, just that his sight is impared such that he is not legally
obliged to actually see things. You should read up on the legislation in
your own country and in ours (Australia) before casting such black and white
assertions. Then again don't, you probably would not understand it anyway.
"An individual shall be considered to be blind for purposes of this
title if he has central visual acuity of 20/200 or less in the better
eye with the use of a correcting lens. An eye which is accompanied by
a limitation in the fields of vision such that the widest diameter of
the visual field subtends an angle no greater than 20 degrees shall be
considered for purposes of the first sentence of this subsection as
having a central visual acuity of 20/200 or less. An individual shall
also be considered to be blind for purposes of this title if he is
blind as defined under a State plan approved under title X or XVI as
in effect for October 1972 and received aid under such plan (on the
basis of blindness) for December 1973, so long as he is continuously
blind as so defined."

Proof of that, please?
Chaddy's visual acuity is not good but is enough to see his screen in
general and to have a feel about what is hapenning on it.
A feeling that allows him to produce Flas presentations?
How strange ...
It's like looking
through some translucant showerscreen glass I believe (Is that right
Chaddy?).
Proof of that, please Chaddy?
Chaddy uses assistive technology to respond in this and many other
newsgroups, one of the reasons his spelling is so bad :) but we who know
Proof of that, please Chaddy?
him do not care about this and even enjoy and joke about it, and I am sure
Chaddy enjoys the odd such joke. Sure.

So, Chaddy is quite well (and mind you blindness, or rather visual
imparment, or whatever Chaddy likes to call his, is not an illness)
The question is not "whatever Chaddy likes to call his" alleged
blindness.
The question is whether he's legally blind or whether he (and you) is
lying about his condition.
If he is lying, and I hope for his own good that he is not, he's
committing an even more serious CRIME than Jerry Sucker has.
And more despicable too, because disguising himself as a blind person
in order to get paid assignments is about the most shabby scam one can
think of.

In the best case scenario, assuming he really does suffer from some
kind of visual impairment, he shows no consideration whatsoever for
those who are in a worse condition than he is by producing non-
accessible content in a web-site that claims to "specialise in making
websites that are accessible to the widest range of people possible":
http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz/index.php
but then goes on to say that "you will need the Flash Player to *view*
the below content":
http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz/portfolio.php

And so, he's basically asking for compassion, while at the same time
denying accessibility to the people he claims to be helping.
Perhaps because he knows that he can't get any money out of those
people?
able to
produce web sites. I have followed his main web site for several years and
find it to be an inspiration. We, who know him, offer critical (in the true
sense of the word, constructructively critical) advice and he is pleased by
this. Chaddy also often offers some rather critical advice to others,
particularly from his visual viewpoint. For this we are gratefull and we
learn from this. I am sure the recipients of that advice are also gratefull.
It is good to hear what ones web site looks like, and operates like, to
someone like Chaddy.
Sure.
I still have to read some of that "constructructively critical" advice
that it's not accompanied by some spam link that leads to one of his
pretended blind-made sites.
I have not viewed any of his flash work, as I don't do flash, but I expect
it to be a similar standard.
Then, in good sense, you should have, before attempting to cast an
opinion on whether he can be considered to be "legally blind".
As to Spheric, aka Trevor, who used to go by another handle, I have seen him
here as well for a long time, prior to his hiatus. While I do not interact
much with him, other than to note his designs go by from time to time (with
the odd critique from myself and, of course Chaddy) I respect him as a
contributor to this newsgroup, and others.
I don't respect him at all.
I sincerely believe he's a real jerk.
He's trying to play Judge without even bothering to know the facts,
and that makes him a most distrustful person and one who should be
avoided by all means.
Now, as to you.

After having a bit of a run-in with Chaddy (which I still have not found,
but I suspect it was just Chaddy stating (as we all do) that your sites
suck) and having your balls chopped off my just about everybody who matters
to the "regulars" in this group you start off a thread likening Chaddys work
to that of how many children. I have just looked at some of these sites (for
the first time) and I am willing to say that some of them look OK. Some of
them are actually quite good, visually. Many however do not look OK. None of
them are up to the standard required by this group and none of them, as far
as I can tell, are up to the professional standard exhibited by Chaddy,
Trevor, or any of the other "regulars" in this group, especially in regard
to (funnily enough) accessibility.
The "standard required by this group" is by no means dictated by you,
who happen to lack any kind of standard values.
<aside>
I just visited every site you offered up.
I haven't offered any site by one.
Man, So much writing and nothing but lies, so far ...
Every one of them fails in some way. Images of test. "Click here". Flags
indicating countries. Fixed width. All of the things this and other
newsgroups would frown upon.
</aside>
Are you talking about flag images?
You know what, smartalec?
You confuse people.
You are not helpful at all to anyone.

The girl who just posted asking for recommendations on her website can
testify to that.
Your only goal is to appear as the smartest and most experienced
webmaster of usenet, by dumping LOTS of technical unrelated non-sense
technical crap.
You really are a waste of bandwidth.
When Chaddys situation was revealed to you you called yourself a bloody
arsehole and indicated you would not return.
Then I realized that either he was not blind at all or he doesn't have
any consideration for real blind people.
And he has a lot of explaining to do, specially if his unsupported
claim of "legal blindness" has landed him any paid job.
You lied. You are still here. You are still attacking people whom you know
exactly nothing about except from what you may discern from their posts
here. Without knowing anything else about them.
Are you talking about yourself, pathetic spoofer?
It certainly seems so.
You truly are a bloody arsehole. One usenet would be better off without.
Usenet is NOT yours.
You are not to tell anybody who should be using it or who shouldn't.
A clear indication of your misunderstanding of how Usenet and the
Internet in general, works.
People like you are the scum of this groups, but I understand you
provide some unwanted benefits. You make the real useful posters look
real good.
Note: You will not get me into a Stukle pissing contest over this. Blather
away. I am listening with beer in hand waiting for your next out of your
arse statement.
So, on top of that you're a drunkard as well?
My God !
And you have the nerve to brag about it???
This is unbelievable !
Have a good rest of your life.
I don't know about the rest of my Life, but you have certainly made my
day.
 
C

Chaddy2222

<posting from alt.html>




I let you out of my killfile for a few minutes and this is what rubbish
appears.

First of all, Chaddy is legally blind. That does not mean his eyes do not
work at all, just that his sight is impared such that he is not legally
obliged to actually see things. You should read up on the legislation in
your own country and in ours (Australia) before casting such black and white
assertions. Then again don't, you probably would not understand it anyway.

Chaddy's visual acuity is not good but is enough to see his screen in
general and to have a feel about what is hapenning on it. It's like looking
through some translucant showerscreen glass I believe (Is that right
Chaddy?). Chaddy uses assistive technology to respond in this and many other
newsgroups, one of the reasons his spelling is so bad :) but we who know
him do not care about this and even enjoy and joke about it, and I am sure
Chaddy enjoys the odd such joke.

So, Chaddy is quite well (and mind you blindness, or rather visual
imparment, or whatever Chaddy likes to call his, is not an illness) able to
produce web sites. I have followed his main web site for several years and
find it to be an inspiration. We, who know him, offer critical (in the true
sense of the word, constructructively critical) advice and he is pleased by
this. Chaddy also often offers some rather critical advice to others,
particularly from his visual viewpoint. For this we are gratefull and we
learn from this. I am sure the recipients of that advice are also gratefull.
It is good to hear what ones web site looks like, and operates like, to
someone like Chaddy.

I have not viewed any of his flash work, as I don't do flash, but I expect
it to be a similar standard.
Hmmmm, it's not bad, i'll probably do some work on it soon though just
to tidy it up a bit.
As to Spheric, aka Trevor, who used to go by another handle, I have seen him
here as well for a long time, prior to his hiatus. While I do not interact
much with him, other than to note his designs go by from time to time (with
the odd critique from myself and, of course Chaddy) I respect him as a
contributor to this newsgroup, and others.
Thanks.

Now, as to you.

After having a bit of a run-in with Chaddy (which I still have not found,
but I suspect it was just Chaddy stating (as we all do) that your sites
suck) and having your balls chopped off my just about everybody who matters
to the "regulars" in this group you start off a thread likening Chaddys work
to that of how many children. I have just looked at some of these sites (for
the first time) and I am willing to say that some of them look OK. Some of
them are actually quite good, visually. Many however do not look OK. None of
them are up to the standard required by this group and none of them, as far
as I can tell, are up to the professional standard exhibited by Chaddy,
Trevor, or any of the other "regulars" in this group, especially in regard
to (funnily enough) accessibility.
Oh well that's a surprise.
<aside>
I just visited every site you offered up.
What are you just really bord or what? siriously!
Every one of them fails in some way. Images of test. "Click here". Flags
indicating countries. Fixed width. All of the things this and other
newsgroups would frown upon.
</aside>
Lets just say my dealings with umm school teachers and web design have
not always been in the favor of decent design such as following the
proper recommendations etc.
When Chaddys situation was revealed to you you called yourself a bloody
arsehole and indicated you would not return.
Yeah, I got a bit excited by that prospect just quietly!.
You lied. You are still here. You are still attacking people whom you know
exactly nothing about except from what you may discern from their posts
here. Without knowing anything else about them.

You truly are a bloody arsehole. One usenet would be better off without.
Yeah I would prefer "The Hatter" anyday compaired to this cluless GIT
of a hack.
Note: You will not get me into a Stukle pissing contest over this. Blather
away. I am listening with beer in hand waiting for your next out of your
arse statement.

Have a good rest of your life.
BTW it was funny for about ahh half a second.
Oh yeah look for a thread called on the search or looking for papers
or something, I really can't be arsed looking it up and I really could
not be stuffed dealing with this 1001 hack anymore I mean it's just
not werth the effort.
KILL FILE IT FOR GOD SAKE!
 
1

1001 Webs

Hmmmm, it's not bad, i'll probably do some work on it soon though just
to tidy it up a bit.



Oh well that's a surprise.


What are you just really bord or what? siriously!




Lets just say my dealings with umm school teachers and web design have
not always been in the favor of decent design such as following the
proper recommendations etc.


Yeah, I got a bit excited by that prospect just quietly!.



Yeah I would prefer "The Hatter" anyday compaired to this cluless GIT
of a hack.



BTW it was funny for about ahh half a second.
Oh yeah look for a thread called on the search or looking for papers
or something, I really can't be arsed looking it up and I really could
not be stuffed dealing with this 1001 hack anymore I mean it's just
not werth the effort.
KILL FILE IT FOR GOD SAKE!

Not so fast Chaddy.

You still have a lot of explaining to do, specially if your
unsupported claim of "legal blindness" has landed you any paid job.

If you have lied about your condition, you have committed FRAUD.
1-
a: deceit, trickery; specifically : intentional perversion of truth in
order to induce another to part with something of value or to
surrender a legal right
b: an act of deceiving or misrepresenting : trick
2-
a: a person who is not what he or she pretends to be : impostor;
also : one who defrauds : cheat
b: one that is not what it seems or is represented to be.

And FRAUD, dear Shabby666, is a CRIME.
And the penalties you are facing for committing such a despicable
CRIME range from $100,000.00 to imprisonment for up to three years, or
both.
Maybe in Australia are even harder.

We are all expectant now.
It shouldn't be that hard to present some proof of your alleged
blindness.
If you don't present any, we'll have to assume that you have been
lying and cheating on people during all this time, just like you lie
and cheat on real blind people when you claim to "specialise in making
websites that are accessible to the widest range of people possible":
http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz/index.php
but then go on to say that "you will need the Flash Player to *view*
the below content":
http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz/portfolio.php

So you're basically asking for compassion, while at the same time
denying accessibility to the people you claim to be helping.
Perhaps because you know that you can't get any money out of those
people?
 
J

Jerry Stuckle

Chaddy2222 said:
Hmmmm, it's not bad, i'll probably do some work on it soon though just
to tidy it up a bit.

Oh well that's a surprise.

What are you just really bord or what? siriously!

Lets just say my dealings with umm school teachers and web design have
not always been in the favor of decent design such as following the
proper recommendations etc.

Yeah, I got a bit excited by that prospect just quietly!.

Yeah I would prefer "The Hatter" anyday compaired to this cluless GIT
of a hack.

BTW it was funny for about ahh half a second.
Oh yeah look for a thread called on the search or looking for papers
or something, I really can't be arsed looking it up and I really could
not be stuffed dealing with this 1001 hack anymore I mean it's just
not werth the effort.
KILL FILE IT FOR GOD SAKE!

Chaddy,

One think Ahmed knows all about is fraud!

Don't worry about him, though. Trolls like him are a dime a dozen.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
(e-mail address removed)
==================
 
T

Travis Newbury

Proof of that, please Chaddy?
Proof of that, please Chaddy?
Sure.
The question is not "whatever Chaddy likes to call his" alleged
blindness.

Come on you slimy cripple prove to me that you can't get out of that
wheel chair!

Really 1001, do we need to go there?
 
J

Jonathan N. Little

1001 Webs wrote:
<snip caustic drivel>

Once in a while you show a glimmer of the possibility that you might
learn something and then you resume this garbage. No better than Hatter.
You can disagree here in alt.html. Offer a good argument and some proof
and we can can learn, but you seem to relish in personal attacks that
have nothing to do with HTML. I suggest you will find a more receptive
audience in NGs the begin with alt.kooks
 
1

1001 Webs

1001 Webs wrote:

<snip caustic drivel>

Once in a while you show a glimmer of the possibility that you might
learn something and then you resume this garbage. No better than Hatter.
Don't know who Hatter is.
Don't care.
Garbage is when someone claims to make accessible sites that
inaccessible to people with accessibility problems.
Garbage is also when someone claims untruthfully to suffer from a
disability problem in order to obtain economic profits.
And Garbage is people that backs up such a loathsome attitude.
You can disagree here in alt.html. Offer a good argument and some proof
and we can can learn, but you seem to relish in personal attacks that
have nothing to do with HTML.
Anyone who cares to read the thread can easily see that everything I
have posted is related to HTML.
It is you and the CRIMINALS you like to associate with, the ones who
"relish" on personal attacks.
I suggest you will find a more receptive
audience in NGs the begin with alt.kooks
You seem to know all about it.
I'd better let you give us a review on those places.
 
D

dE|_

"1001 Webs" says along with many other things;
Don't know who Hatter is.
Don't care.
Garbage is when someone claims to make accessible sites that
inaccessible to people with accessibility problems.
Garbage is also when someone claims untruthfully to suffer from a
disability problem in order to obtain economic profits.
And Garbage is people that backs up such a loathsome attitude.

Listen dude; turn the computer off, get yourself a little bag of green, a
bottle of red wine and spend a quiet night in with the Beach Boys.

---dE|_---
 
B

Bone Ur

Well bust mah britches and call me cheeky, on Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:12:47 GMT
Travis Newbury scribed:
Come on you slimy cripple prove to me that you can't get out of that
wheel chair!

Really 1001, do we need to go there?

Don't waste your time, Travis. This guy is a moron; he has neither smarts
nor class. It's best to ignore him like maggots in an alley.
 
1

1001 Webs

"1001 Webs" says along with many other things;


Listen dude; turn the computer off, get yourself a little bag of green, a
bottle of red wine and spend a quiet night in with the Beach Boys.

I'd rather listen to the likes of Guns 'n' Roses & Extreme :)
More than words is all you have to do to make it real ...
 
D

dorayme

"rf said:
When Chaddys situation was revealed to you you called yourself a bloody
arsehole and indicated you would not return.

He returned in less than a second flat! Which I noted because I
had that feeling I should reserve judgement on his sincerity.
 
R

Red E. Kilowatt

Can't help it.
It's Jerry's fault.

Jerry is not responsible for your actions. YOU are responsible for your
actions.
In real life I am a very polite person, the kind old Ladies love to
have for company for games of Bridge and tea parties.
But just thinking of him, I start to envision all kinds of bizarre
things.

Sounds like you have some mental problems.
I have consulted the problem with my psychiatrist,
Ah-ha!

and after reading
the Posts, she says that if it feels good, go ahead and do it,
because, I quote:
"It will help him realize that verbal abuse can be very damaging,

Trading flames is going to help someone realize that their "verbal abuse
can be very damaging?" Oh please. Get real. No one learns anything of
value from trading flames.
It is also crucial that he gets help in this instance.
There are professionals who are qualified to help him to discontinue
abusing other people.
They will also help him to look at his underlying issues, like his
fixation with "mommies" and physical organs.

I see. So you are flaming him so that he will be inspired to seek help?
Yeah right.
He's clearly in need of attention. Perhaps he, too, was abused at some
time".

He too?
So I am doing it for his own good.
Because after all, I am a nice person, and he has to come to realize
that CRIME, in any of its variations, does not pay off.

Pathetic.

If you'd stop trying to bullshit people, you might have an easier time
here.
 
1

1001 Webs

He returned in less than a second flat! Which I noted because I
had that feeling I should reserve judgement on his sincerity.

But your judgment on sincerity, dear dorayme, is worthless, since you
had been unable to discern the criminal activities that both Jerry
Sucker and Shoddy666 had been committing on these groups for a number
of years.
 
1

1001 Webs

(e-mail address removed),


Jerry is not responsible for your actions. YOU are responsible for your
actions.
My actions are a defense from Jerry's actions.
You all seem to "forget" that besides attacking my reputation and
interests, he's committing FRAUD by advertising himself as the
president of a non-existent corporation.
If you think that's OK, I would really see how would you react if it
happens to you or if some person you care about gets cheated by Jerry.
Your actions in fact are worse than mine, because you are siding up
with a CRIMINAL.
Sounds like you have some mental problems.
Good line.
How long did it take you to forge it?
Even better.
Trading flames is going to help someone realize that their "verbal abuse
can be very damaging?" Oh please. Get real. No one learns anything of
value from trading flames.
Disagree.
Jerry will now think twice before attempting to discredit people.
I see. So you are flaming him so that he will be inspired to seek help?
Yeah right. Right.


He too?
Those are the psychiatrist's words.
You know how they are, they tend to stereotype everybody and in
Jerry's case, she thinks that he's one of those abused children that
become criminals when they grow up.
Pathetic.
I know.
I've never met such a pathetic CRIMINAL, really.
If you'd stop trying to bullshit people, you might have an easier time
here.

I'm having a great time, thank you.
 
1

1001 Webs

ROFLMAO,! Oh, Ahmed, you think we're so dumb. But the only stoopid one
here is you! And you make a lousy liar.

Or maybe we should let the rest of the world know you live at 35 Avda
America in Madrid, Spain.
Don't know who that person may be,

but I think that what we should let the rest of the World know is that
besides committing fraud, you also beat up your wife:
Court System: DISTRICT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY - CIVIL SYSTEM
Case Number: 0602SP019022003Claim Type:DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
Complaint No: 001(STUCKLE, ELIZABETH M) Vs:(STUCKLE, JERRY D )

What a loathsome low-life coward you are.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
473,708
Messages
2,569,347
Members
44,654
Latest member
7Jhamal74

Latest Threads

Top