F
fir
sorry for my weak english
It is somewhat suprising maybe, but my
recent thinking in this theme, brings to
me some notice, that on some platforms (like windows)
there is (would be) no problem with
full speed resizable arrays - c language
could support resizable arrays to
completion of normal noresizable arrays
it caould be just like this
resizable(50*1024*1024) char tab[1024];
or something like that with some better sytax
(where 50*1024*1024 is here a limit of max resize)
here, system should alloc tab[1024] and reserve
1024*1024*50 bytes of logical memory but just
bind 1024 bytes of physical memory at start
with some
resize tab[10*1024*1024];
or
resize tab[10];
then it could bind unbind physical ram to it
So it looks like that there is no problem
of getting lov lewel resizable and fully fast
primitive arrays in c on some system
(I am working on language codenamed c2 which
is c with improvements and i would wery much like
to get it here) (!)
It is somewhat suprising maybe, but my
recent thinking in this theme, brings to
me some notice, that on some platforms (like windows)
there is (would be) no problem with
full speed resizable arrays - c language
could support resizable arrays to
completion of normal noresizable arrays
it caould be just like this
resizable(50*1024*1024) char tab[1024];
or something like that with some better sytax
(where 50*1024*1024 is here a limit of max resize)
here, system should alloc tab[1024] and reserve
1024*1024*50 bytes of logical memory but just
bind 1024 bytes of physical memory at start
with some
resize tab[10*1024*1024];
or
resize tab[10];
then it could bind unbind physical ram to it
So it looks like that there is no problem
of getting lov lewel resizable and fully fast
primitive arrays in c on some system
(I am working on language codenamed c2 which
is c with improvements and i would wery much like
to get it here) (!)