T
tenxian
Is implementing a Java class a process of procedural programming?
tenxian said:Is implementing a Java class a process of procedural programming?
There is no single globally accepted definition of »procedural
programming«. So you should give the terminology you refer to.
One might say that Java programming is procedural, because
Java methods could be interpreted to be »procedures«. We do
not have to push arguments onto the stack or load them into
registers and then jump to some subroutine anymore. But one
rarely does say this, because there rarely is need to point
this out.
There is no single globally accepted definition of »procedural
programming«. So you should give the terminology you refer to.
One might say that Java programming is procedural, because
Java methods could be interpreted to be »procedures«. We do
not have to push arguments onto the stack or load them into
registers and then jump to some subroutine anymore. But one
rarely does say this, because there rarely is need to point
this out.
tenxian said:So Java is a programming language that combines object-oriented
programming and procedural programming, right?
Is implementing a Java class a process of procedural programming?
tenxian said:Is implementing a Java class a process of procedural programming?
Stefan Ram said:There is no single globally accepted definition of »procedural
programming«. So you should give the terminology you refer to.
One might say that Java programming is procedural, because
Java methods could be interpreted to be »procedures«. We do
not have to push arguments onto the stack or load them into
registers and then jump to some subroutine anymore. But one
rarely does say this, because there rarely is need to point
this out.
Qu0ll said:Hey Stefan, I like the way you surround terms with a "<<" and ">>"
characters but I don't know how to add them in myself.
What key sequence and/or news reader do you need to do that?
Mark said:Short answer - no.
Java is squarely in the object oriented camp. You need a programmer
trained in object oriented programming, and object oriented design too.
A programmer trained in only procedural techniques will have a hard
time producing a quality Java program. Try to get someone with a SCJD
or at least SCJP, or lots of good experience with Java and object
oriented programming.
P.S. To c.l.j.p - this is the same guy who was advertising a great idea
for only 10,000 yaun just yesterday. I assume he's trying to read some
resumes right now.
RedGrittyBrick said:Mark Space wrote:
I think if you perversely wanted to write procedural program in Java you
could do so. You'd have to avoid using most of the standard class
library so you'd probably have to waste a lot of time reinventing
procedural equivalents of a lot of OO library code.
It was 10,0000 and it was yuan.
(Whatever happened to RenMinBi and FECs?)
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.