Anup said:
hey i clicked the reply link to his msg! u can see who replied whom by
clicking on "view as tree"
So what makes you think anyone else is using the same interface? I know
a blind person who reads Usenet and does *not* use Google. I know
people who use text based news readers where there are *no* buttons to
click on. In my case, I have the news reader (not Google) set to hide
all read messages since it makes it easier for me which means that even
with a tree view (I use a threaded view, effectively the same thing) I
might not be able to see the previous post. Finally, there is absolutely
no guarantee that the message you are replying to has, or ever will,
propagate to all the people who see your message.
Google is just one of a vast number of interfaces to Google, and it is a
comparatively recent one at that.
So please quote properly, and that includes leaving in the lines that
say who said what which you just deleted. Your deleting them means it
would require effort for me to see which of the many sensible people
here you were replying to.
Note, this is not intended to be getting at you, rather it is explaining
the situation. I accept that Google don't make it obvious and, in fact,
make it needlessly hard for you to do the right thing. There is a link
off this page
http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/ to a questionair so that
you can vote for Google to "Default quoting of previous message in
replies" which would make it easier for everyone using Google to do the
right thing. Please go and vote to make life better for all Usenet users.
Then do so please. In this post you have continued to use "u" for you.
> there was a time when i used to hate people who
wrote like this but eventually it just seemed simpler to write that
way!
Whether it is easier to write like that is largely irrelevant. Please
understand that it is harder to read especially for people for whom
reading English is not easy or natural, such as Dyslexics and people for
whom English is not their first language. I know we have people in both
groups here. Also please remember, you write the post once but it gets
read many times, so if you spend an extra 30 seconds but save 20 people
5 seconds each it is *still* a net saving.
We generally don't mind real errors cause by English not being someone's
first language. Those are natural and understandable. Although sometimes
such errors are pointed out to help people improve their English.
ps-was teh quoting ok this time?
No, you snipped the bit saying who you were replying to. However, it was
a vast improvement. Thank you for making the effort though.