E
Eric Sosman
charlesbos73 said:[...]
Actually instead of becoming a JLS nazi, [...]
Goodbye.
charlesbos73 said:[...]
Actually instead of becoming a JLS nazi, [...]
Mike said:Eric said:Goodbye.charlesbos73 said:[...]
Actually instead of becoming a JLS nazi, [...]
In context, it's even worse. "Instead of taking the JLS as gospel, we could
discuss what OO theory tells us about the proper approach to name hiding."
charlesbos73 said:I'm currently working on a wonderfully "OO designed"
application and the translation to Java is a breeze.
Zero instance of the "abstract" keyword.
Zero instance of the "protected" keyword.
"extends" is only ever applied to interface.
And there's *much* *much* more heresy to JLS nazis than
that. A complex subpart has been implemented using *only*
immutable objects. Not a single setter. "OO over
immutable objects" (heresy uh !?).
charlesbos73 said:Another hyper-constructive one-liner from Lew focusing
on the bigger picture.
Amazing open-mindedness.
Actually instead of becoming a JLS nazi, I'd recommend
the OP to study the meaning of inheritance in the bigger
OO picture.
Learning to become a JLS nazi apparently may hinder
people from seeing the bigger picture and from staying
polite
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.