Title bar question

[orljustin]

Hey Nut,

I replied using google. Blame their beta. It was in there.

In this case, I think people can figure it out since I responded
DIRECTLY to the OP.

oj

 

[Barbara de Zoete]

Hey Nut,

Pardon? Since you are posting to a newsgroup, you just called all
participating a nut.

I replied using google. Blame their beta. It was in there.

Get yourself a good newsclient and subscribe with

In this case, I think people can figure it out since I responded
DIRECTLY to the OP.

Since in my newsclient I cannot see that, I still have not a clue what you
are talking about. I also very mucht dislike your attitude.

Say goodbye,

 

[Karl Core]

Hey Nut,

I replied using google. Blame their beta. It was in there.

It is a poor mechanic who blames his tools.

In this case, I think people can figure it out since I responded
DIRECTLY to the OP.

oj

Welcome to the killfile

 

[orljustin]

Wow, great comeback. I'm crushed.

oj

 

[Joel Shepherd]

Hey Nut,


I replied using google. Blame their beta. It was in there.

Okay, well, I used the Google beta a couple days ago and had no issues
with losing the entire post that I was replying to. You might not have
deleted it manually, would you?

In this case, I think people can figure it out since I responded
DIRECTLY to the OP.

There's no guarantee that your message will arrive in my newsreader in
some specific order relative to the OP's message (or any other). I may
never even see the OP's message. That's why it's important to quote the
bits you're responding to.

All the best, etc., etc.

--
Joel.

http://www.cv6.org/
"May she also say with just pride:
I have done the State some service."

 

[rf]

Barbara de Zoete wrote

Since in my newsclient I cannot see that, I still have not a clue what you
are talking about. I also very mucht dislike your attitude.

The handle, or rather the bit after the @, says it all

 

[Neal]

Hey Nut,

I replied using google. Blame their beta. It was in there.

In this case, I think people can figure it out since I responded
DIRECTLY to the OP.

1) In Usenet posts propogate differently. Your post may arrive before the
one you replied to. Therefore, qoting means a great eal.

2) Sometimes due to software or other factors the messages don't get
attached to thepost they're replying to.

3) Use a Usenet-compliant agent (even OE can do it) with a newsserver
(news.individual.net - see <http://www.individual.net>) and reap many
benefits.

 

[Barbara de Zoete]

Barbara de Zoete wrote



The handle, or rather the bit after the @, says it all

The aol.com bit? What's with AOL? Are their subscribers required to be
aged under fifteen or something like that?

 

[Kris]

oj

Did you do it or not?

 

[Toby Inkster]

I replied using google. Blame their beta. It was in there.

And your browser doesn't have a copy/paste function?

 

[orljustin]

Hey,

1) In Usenet posts propogate differently. Your post may arrive before the
one you replied to. Therefore, qoting means a great eal.

Yes, I know that. As I said, still figuring out the google beta. I
assume most newsreaders are able to display a threaded ...thread.

2) Sometimes due to software or other factors the messages don't get
attached to thepost they're replying to.

3) Use a Usenet-compliant agent (even OE can do it) with a newsserver

(news.individual.net - see <http://www.individual.net>) and reap many

benefits.

You don't know my situation, and in my situation, google works. Thanks
though.

oj

 

[orljustin]

Barbara de Zoete wrote



The handle, or rather the bit after the @, says it all

Oh, ha ha. Wow. In all my 18 years of poking around online, I've
never heard such a zinger. It's the same garbage address I've used for
the last 6 years. Don't try to attribute anything to it.

oj

 

[Tabasco1]

Learn CSS. It's easy, painless and functional.

Well not exactly painless...




Charles
Torrance, California
http://www.tcpslashipdomains.com Now accepting PayPal
http://www.tcpslaship.com under construction

 

[Henry]

Well not exactly painless...

Not easy!

Full of pain because of IE bugs.

Regards funcional, you'll still go back to a mixture of tables and css.

 

[Wyrm]

Not easy!

Come on, CSS is not that hard at all Painless it may not be though
because of...

Full of pain because of IE bugs.

Yups, there are plenty of those, but after you deal them few times you what
to do next time when run into similar issue.

It's like that with everything in life, to master something it takes effort
and to learn workarounds when there are some problems If you do not know
answer, ask around

Nicest side in CSS is that because of it, HTML code can be very simplified
and clean most of the cases. Still there sometimes are uses for tables, but
most cases not really

 

[Wÿrm]

Yups, there are plenty of those, but after you deal them few times you __KNOW__ what
to do next time when run into similar issue.

Damn, maybe I should lear to read my post before sending because dropping
out words. Maybe I need few beers and some sleep after all..

 

[rf]

Damn, maybe I should lear to read my post before sending

I wouldn't lear at them too much, they may slap you in the face

 

[Wÿrm]

I wouldn't lear at them too much, they may slap you in the face

hehe D Damn, not my day really Seems I'm having one of those days that
everything goes little bit wrong Oh well, now (finally) few beers and
some movie and then some real sleep. Maybe tomorrow will be better day...