Usability Job Opportunities

[Jerry Stuckle]

So you're a k00k, eh stuckkie? Figures. Since when has suing become
illegal?

I did not say suing was illegal, idiot.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
(e-mail address removed)
==================

 

[Jerry Stuckle]

You'll not be able to do much about the offensive contact, but you CAN
comlain that the posts are off charter for any one of
uk.net.web.autoring, comp.lang.php and
comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html

The complaint would go to comcast and giganews (abuse @ comcast.com
and abuse @ giganews.com) Be sure to include the FULL headers for
each post and don't put the posts in a separate file. Paste several
in one email, separate it with lines

----------------------------------------
one post
----------------------------------------
one post
----------------------------------------

etc.

And be sure to simply state your case. Don't demand, don't whine like
Jerry.


If comcast and giganews get complaints from several different people,
they'll tell him to stop. If he doesn't stop, he'll soon be posting
from somewhere else. Once he gets the idea that each time he does
it, he'll get nuked, he might just wise up.

Go ahead and try, loser. You're only making a fool of yourself.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
(e-mail address removed)
==================

 

[Gary L. Burnore]

Yep,

Liar.


Oh, and while you're ignoring me, how do you like the new .sig
material?



Jerry claims suing is illegal

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

You'd like that, wouldn't you? But I don't need to sue you. There
are other ways to handle people like you. I prefer the legal ways.



Jerry on websites:

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:57:07 -0500, Jerry Stuckle

>
> Go for it, dipshit. I've been called far worse. My employer is
> DataBasix.com. OOPS! Too bad for you.
>

Oh, you mean the one who can't even keep a website running?
ROFLMAO!

While also saying

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

WRONG ANSWER, FRAUD. It has been and is registered. You just
can't find a web page for it. Sorry, troll.


--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

 

[Gary L. Burnore]

Go ahead and try, loser. You're only making a fool of yourself.

Another pkb! Neat, stukkie.


Jerry claims suing is illegal

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

You'd like that, wouldn't you? But I don't need to sue you. There
are
other ways to handle people like you. I prefer the legal ways.



Jerry on websites:

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:57:07 -0500, Jerry Stuckle

>
> Go for it, dipshit. I've been called far worse. My employer is
> DataBasix.com. OOPS! Too bad for you.
>

Oh, you mean the one who can't even keep a website running?
ROFLMAO!

While also saying

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

WRONG ANSWER, FRAUD. It has been and is registered. You just
can't
find a web page for it. Sorry, troll.


--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

 

[Gary L. Burnore]

I did not say suing was illegal, idiot.

Jerry claims suing is illegal

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

You'd like that, wouldn't you? But I don't need to sue you. There
are other ways to handle people like you. I prefer the legal ways.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

 

[Jerry Stuckle]

Still ignoring me, I see. How's that going? Why can't you just stop
adding comp.lang.php?


Liar I've no spammer friends. I've had the same two accounts for
more than 13 years. Too bad you can't say the same.

ROFLMAO! Your ONLY friends are spammers.

Nope, I've only had mine for 16 years (email, that is). I haven't had
this usenet account for 13 years because comcast hasn't offered it in my
area for that long. But I've had it ever since it has been offered.

Yet another lie. Got any proof I've spammed? Looks like those
calling you a fraud are right.

Hey, you claimed this whole thread is spam, and you're posting in it.
So you must be a spammer.

You obviously do. And, since you cna't answer the question, you
obviously know I'm right.

Not at all. No one gives a flying **** what you think.

And in a.w.w., several of us have gotten spammers kicked off for
spamming. Sorry, the ISPs disagree with you.

You are so owned.

Nope, not at all. But you must really be hooked on me to interrupt a
conversation and start arguing. It shows just how much YOU are owned.

ROFLMAO!

Let's review. You post crap to comp.lang.php, I ask you to stop. I'm
not crossposting to comp.lang.php, I'm already here. OOPs, you lose
again.

You don't own usenet. And I'm in c.l.p., also. In fact, much more
regular here than you are.

So I guess you're posting crap to c.l.p., and you need to be nuked!

Ok.

Yea, make a fool of yourself.

Guess we'll see. Maybe I do, maybe I don't. I DO know that, at
minimum, you're showing EVERYONE in comp.lang.php that you have
1. No self control
2. No CLUE
C. No respect for anyone ELSE in comp.lang.php

Thanks for showing your true colors!

Nope, YOU are doing exactly that. Unlike you, I'm a regular posted in
c.l.p. You're just a troll trying to claim you're a regular. You aren't.

Yeah, I've seen a lot of fools in my days. You're right up there at
the top.



IKWIABWAY noted.

Typical troll response.

IKWIABWAY #2. Gonna try for two?

Projecting again, Gary? ROFLMAO!

There it is, #3. Good job. I knew you could do it.

Yea, you have shown your true troll colors. But then there seem to be
quite a few websites exposing you for what you really are.

That's it? The best you've got. Damn, stuckkie you're lame.

And you're the best WalMart' got?

You can say that as many times as you like and you're still wrong.
Besisdes, unlike you, I really do have the power to decide. You're
still not even smart enough to know why. Funny, that.

You can keep denying it. You can't decide anything. You're only a
legend in your own mind. You have no power.

If you have so much power, let's see you get me kicked off of usenet.
Go ahead. Troll.

IKWIABWAY #4. Gotta be a record.

Oh, how's that "ignoring me" going?

And you're an ignorant troll. Not only ignorant, but stoopid to the
max. As so many other people have found.


--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
(e-mail address removed)
==================

 

[Jerry Stuckle]

Gary L. Burnore wrote:
In <[email protected]> on Thu, 03 Jan
2008 14:03:11 -0500, Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
wrote:
Dick Gaughan wrote:
In <C3A2D429.F13D%[email protected]> on Thu, 03 Jan 2008
I don't get it. Why was the original post spam?
It wasn't. It was many things, including being a
pathetically-badly disguised festering heap of marketing shite,
but it wasn't spam.
Those insisting it was spam are merely flaunting their
cluelessness. A post is *only* defined as being spam when it
breaches the Breidbart Index. Nobody has provided any evidence
that that particular bit of midge's effluence has exceeded the BI.
The Breidbart Index is woefully out of date.
When was that decided? I must have missed that debate.
It's been dismissed as virtually meaningless for quite a while, now.
SPAM has changed, but the index hasn't.
In a.w.w, ads of any kind are considered SPAM.
What aww might or might not consider is about as relevant outside
aww as a spider's fart. I'm not reading this thread in aww.
Fine. I am reading this in a.w.w., and it is spam here.
The BI was adopted as a way of avoiding would-be Usenet vigilantes
deciding to classify posts as spam on the basis that they disliked
the contents. This discussion shows that the wisdom of that
concern still has relevance.
So you have some meaningless, out of date measurement which doesn't say
something is spam or not, but only classifies the severity of the SPAM.
Right. Try again.
Until someone else comes up with a better content-blind objective
definition of spam, the BI is still the benchmark.
There is. The charter and/or FAQs for the newsgroup. And the FAQs for
a.w.w., which were agreed to by the majority of the regulars here,
classify this as spam.
LIA[SLAP]
FAQs aren't charters and are not enforceable. Charters in unmoderated
alt gorups are also uninforceable. Off charter in comp groups, on the
other hand, is something that can get your news provider's attention.
That's funny. I've gotten quite a few hosting of accounts canceled
because I've reported spam.
Only if it's real spam. What you're calling spam isn't. There are
very specific rules.
And according to the FAQ's in a.w.w, it is spam.
A FAQ is only a list of frequently asked questions, Jerry. It is no
way enforceable and can't change the meaning of the word. >> They're
called alt. for a reason.
Sorry, you 're about 10 years behind the curve.

Gee, it's the good ones who cancel accounts because I show them the
spam.
Nope. Only a fool would believe what you're calling spam is actually
spam.
Only a fool would believe unsolicited ads where they are not wanted is
not SPAM.

However, it seems you've just called a lot of respected hosting
companies fools.



It is ENFORCEABLE (get a spell checker).
More proof of how you really are? Good! You're showing every newbie
in comp.lang.php that you're an idiot. Hope that's what you wanted.
It's what you're getting.
Nope. Just that YOU are. Can't even afford a spell checker.

And it DOES mean something.
Nothing at all.
Sorry.
Liar.
You're the one calling someone a LIAR! ROFLMAO!

Your arguments don't work.
It's not an argument, it's a fact.
Show me where it is a FACT. Otherwise, it is just YOUR OPINION. And
YOUR ARGUMENT.

They're too far out of date.
Good thing is, you don't get to decide.
Neither do you.

But in this case the op is a troll well-known in a.w.w. He just morphed
names, and it took a little while to catch on (good catch, Karl!).
SO? What does that have to do with comp.lang.php?
I didn't start it.
So you're so controlled you simply MUST post to comp.lang.php. Got
it. You're owned, bigtime.
I have the right to defend myself - especially against charges of
criminal activity. Period. You don't like it? Ignore the thread if
you don't like it.

I'm just trying to show people who Rafael
Martinez-Minuesa Martinez really is
You're doing just fine at showing he's the holder of your leash. Now
sit like a good little poodle.
ROFLMAO! You're even more stoopid than most people if you believe that.

And if I called you a fraud and a liar, will you just ignore it? I
think not. What would your employer do if he/she found out?

- a troll and a spammer.
SPAM is BI>20. His post was off topic, sure. But not spam. If you're
saying off topic is spam then your posts to comp.lang.php (and
comp.infosystems.www..... are spam too). Difference being: YOU can
lose your account for it faster than he can. Wanna see?
Wrong, Gary. And has been for years. You are woefully out of date.
You DON'T get to say what SPAM is, you pitiful SCAMMER.
The Usenet is not yours and there are far more knowledgeable and
experienced people than you who know much better than you.
If you were not so arrogant and had just a little bit of common sense
you'd listen to them.

And neither do you, trolling fraud.

Ah yes, everyone's a troll and fraud for pointing out what a hypocrite
you are.

Nope. You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite. I don't spam.

No, actually, in an alt.* group, they don't.

Wrong again, troll.

Doesn't matter at all. Don't like it? Too bad.

It sure does to those ISP's who have canceled accounts due to the
complaints.

Everyone that knows what you are is a troll. Neat!

Yep, troll. Projecting again.


--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
(e-mail address removed)
==================

 

[Jerry Stuckle]

On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:57:07 -0500, Jerry Stuckle

Gary L. Burnore wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:00:21 -0500, Jerry Stuckle

Gary L. Burnore wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:26:11 -0500, Gary L. Burnore

On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:49:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle

Dick Gaughan wrote:
In <[email protected]> on Thu, 03 Jan
2008 14:03:11 -0500, Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
wrote:

Dick Gaughan wrote:
In <C3A2D429.F13D%[email protected]> on Thu, 03 Jan 2008

I don't get it. Why was the original post spam?
It wasn't. It was many things, including being a
pathetically-badly disguised festering heap of marketing shite,
but it wasn't spam.

Those insisting it was spam are merely flaunting their
cluelessness. A post is *only* defined as being spam when it
breaches the Breidbart Index. Nobody has provided any evidence
that that particular bit of midge's effluence has exceeded the BI.

The Breidbart Index is woefully out of date.
When was that decided? I must have missed that debate.

It's been dismissed as virtually meaningless for quite a while, now.
SPAM has changed, but the index hasn't.

In a.w.w, ads of any kind are considered SPAM.
What aww might or might not consider is about as relevant outside
aww as a spider's fart. I'm not reading this thread in aww.

Fine. I am reading this in a.w.w., and it is spam here.

The BI was adopted as a way of avoiding would-be Usenet vigilantes
deciding to classify posts as spam on the basis that they disliked
the contents. This discussion shows that the wisdom of that
concern still has relevance.

So you have some meaningless, out of date measurement which doesn't say
something is spam or not, but only classifies the severity of the SPAM.

Right. Try again.

Until someone else comes up with a better content-blind objective
definition of spam, the BI is still the benchmark.

There is. The charter and/or FAQs for the newsgroup. And the FAQs for
a.w.w., which were agreed to by the majority of the regulars here,
classify this as spam.

LIA[SLAP]
FAQs aren't charters and are not enforceable. Charters in unmoderated
alt gorups are also uninforceable. Off charter in comp groups, on the
other hand, is something that can get your news provider's attention.
My bad - didn't look first at the group list. While perfectly
acceptable in AWW, in a comp group you're right in that its off
charter which *is* enforcable. Perhaps the zealots in AWW should
attempt to have it reclassified into a group that has an official
charter, but in the meantime nobody cares )
There's really no such thing as a valid charter in an alt.* group.
Alt.config is a bogus group of morons who want to turn alt into
another form of big8 groups. Never gonna happen. Of course,
moderated groups can and do control content but non-moderated groups
are freeform. Stukkie will just have to learn to use a killfile
there.

Nevertheless, please accept my apologies for the mistake.
Accepted. Unfortunately, Jerry won't stop crossposting back to
comp.*.
Sorry, Gary.
Liar.

Let's see you prove that statement, Gary.
You're doing it for me, Jerry. YOU are still posting to comp.lang.php
and he's not "making you do it". YOU are the one posting off charter.
YOU. Not him.

And your posts are on topic? ROFLMAO! Pot-Kettle-Black.

How's that ignoring me thing going, stukkie? OOPS, did you LIE again?

ROFLMAO! Keep it up, troll!

Hahahahaha. DataBasix isn't a WEBSITE, dumbass.

Nope, but you can't keep a website up. ROFLMAO!

Bring it on, stuckkie. You know you want to.

Not at all. I don't have to. Too many others have exposed you for the
troll you are.

Liar.

Projecting again, Troll?

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
(e-mail address removed)
==================

 

[Meat Plow]

ROFLMAO! Your ONLY friends are spammers.

Care to prove this?

 

[Gary L. Burnore]

ROFLMAO! Your ONLY friends are spammers.

Prove it, stukkie.

Nope, I've only had mine for 16 years (email, that is). I haven't had
this usenet account for 13 years because comcast hasn't offered it in my
area for that long. But I've had it ever since it has been offered.

So? Is that supposed to mean anything?

Hey, you claimed this whole thread is spam, and you're posting in it.

Poor stukkie. I've made it quite clear that this thread isn't spam.
Looks like it's time to add more posts to the list of your lies. No
wonder they call you a fraud, you really ARE a fraud.

So you must be a spammer.


Not at all. No one gives a flying **** what you think.

You do.

And in a.w.w., several of us have gotten spammers kicked off for
spamming. Sorry, the ISPs disagree with you.

If it's spam, anyone can get anyone kicked off anywhere (except maybe
roadrunner). that which you do not like to read isn't spam. Anyone
who's lost an account bacause you claimed something was spam when it
wasn't needs to email me. I'll see to it they get access somewhere
that won't put up with liars like you.

Nope, not at all. But you must really be hooked on me to interrupt a
conversation and start arguing. It shows just how much YOU are owned.

ROFLMAO!

Says the fool who claims he's ignoring me.

You don't own usenet.

I own part of it.

And I'm in c.l.p., also. In fact, much more
regular here than you are.

You're wrong more, too. I note that most people in comp.lang.perl
think you're a dick.

So I guess you're posting crap to c.l.p., and you need to be nuked!

Go for it, dipshit.

You can keep denying it. You can't decide anything. You're only a
legend in your own mind. You have no power.

Hahaha. Yet another IKWIABWAY. You're really good at repeating what I
say, poodle.


Jerry claims suing is illegal

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

You'd like that, wouldn't you? But I don't need to sue you. There
are other ways to handle people like you. I prefer the legal ways.



Jerry on websites:

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:57:07 -0500, Jerry Stuckle

>
> Go for it, dipshit. I've been called far worse. My employer is
> DataBasix.com. OOPS! Too bad for you.
>

Oh, you mean the one who can't even keep a website running?
ROFLMAO!

While also saying

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

WRONG ANSWER, FRAUD. It has been and is registered. You just
can't find a web page for it. Sorry, troll.


--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

 

[dE|_]

"Neredbojias" says after the statements of:

Face it, Chaddy, this thread doesn't have any "best" parts. What tickles
me, though, are the spam accusations. In the general sense, the whole
thread is spam.

I get around 50-60 emails per day trying to sell me sexual enhancement
drugs, I couldn't give a gorilla's gonads if somebody posts an ad for their
business on Usenet once a month so I posted the first response with light
hearted sarcasm. Now we have anarchy because people have grudges.

Anybody fancy a pint?

---dE|_---

 

[Gary L. Burnore]

RafaMinu wrote:
Gary L. Burnore wrote:
In <[email protected]> on Thu, 03 Jan
2008 14:03:11 -0500, Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
wrote:
Dick Gaughan wrote:
In <C3A2D429.F13D%[email protected]> on Thu, 03 Jan 2008
I don't get it. Why was the original post spam?
It wasn't. It was many things, including being a
pathetically-badly disguised festering heap of marketing shite,
but it wasn't spam.
Those insisting it was spam are merely flaunting their
cluelessness. A post is *only* defined as being spam when it
breaches the Breidbart Index. Nobody has provided any evidence
that that particular bit of midge's effluence has exceeded the BI.
The Breidbart Index is woefully out of date.
When was that decided? I must have missed that debate.
It's been dismissed as virtually meaningless for quite a while, now.
SPAM has changed, but the index hasn't.
In a.w.w, ads of any kind are considered SPAM.
What aww might or might not consider is about as relevant outside
aww as a spider's fart. I'm not reading this thread in aww.
Fine. I am reading this in a.w.w., and it is spam here.
The BI was adopted as a way of avoiding would-be Usenet vigilantes
deciding to classify posts as spam on the basis that they disliked
the contents. This discussion shows that the wisdom of that
concern still has relevance.
So you have some meaningless, out of date measurement which doesn't say
something is spam or not, but only classifies the severity of the SPAM.
Right. Try again.
Until someone else comes up with a better content-blind objective
definition of spam, the BI is still the benchmark.
There is. The charter and/or FAQs for the newsgroup. And the FAQs for
a.w.w., which were agreed to by the majority of the regulars here,
classify this as spam.
LIA[SLAP]
FAQs aren't charters and are not enforceable. Charters in unmoderated
alt gorups are also uninforceable. Off charter in comp groups, on the
other hand, is something that can get your news provider's attention.
That's funny. I've gotten quite a few hosting of accounts canceled
because I've reported spam.
Only if it's real spam. What you're calling spam isn't. There are
very specific rules.
And according to the FAQ's in a.w.w, it is spam.
A FAQ is only a list of frequently asked questions, Jerry. It is no
way enforceable and can't change the meaning of the word. >> They're
called alt. for a reason.
Sorry, you 're about 10 years behind the curve.

Gee, it's the good ones who cancel accounts because I show them the
spam.
Nope. Only a fool would believe what you're calling spam is actually
spam.
Only a fool would believe unsolicited ads where they are not wanted is
not SPAM.

However, it seems you've just called a lot of respected hosting
companies fools.



It is ENFORCEABLE (get a spell checker).
More proof of how you really are? Good! You're showing every newbie
in comp.lang.php that you're an idiot. Hope that's what you wanted.
It's what you're getting.
Nope. Just that YOU are. Can't even afford a spell checker.

And it DOES mean something.
Nothing at all.
Sorry.
Liar.
You're the one calling someone a LIAR! ROFLMAO!

Your arguments don't work.
It's not an argument, it's a fact.
Show me where it is a FACT. Otherwise, it is just YOUR OPINION. And
YOUR ARGUMENT.

They're too far out of date.
Good thing is, you don't get to decide.
Neither do you.

But in this case the op is a troll well-known in a.w.w. He just morphed
names, and it took a little while to catch on (good catch, Karl!).
SO? What does that have to do with comp.lang.php?
I didn't start it.
So you're so controlled you simply MUST post to comp.lang.php. Got
it. You're owned, bigtime.
I have the right to defend myself - especially against charges of
criminal activity. Period. You don't like it? Ignore the thread if
you don't like it.

I'm just trying to show people who Rafael
Martinez-Minuesa Martinez really is
You're doing just fine at showing he's the holder of your leash. Now
sit like a good little poodle.
ROFLMAO! You're even more stoopid than most people if you believe that.

And if I called you a fraud and a liar, will you just ignore it? I
think not. What would your employer do if he/she found out?

- a troll and a spammer.
SPAM is BI>20. His post was off topic, sure. But not spam. If you're
saying off topic is spam then your posts to comp.lang.php (and
comp.infosystems.www..... are spam too). Difference being: YOU can
lose your account for it faster than he can. Wanna see?
Wrong, Gary. And has been for years. You are woefully out of date.
You DON'T get to say what SPAM is, you pitiful SCAMMER.
The Usenet is not yours and there are far more knowledgeable and
experienced people than you who know much better than you.
If you were not so arrogant and had just a little bit of common sense
you'd listen to them.

And neither do you, trolling fraud.

Ah yes, everyone's a troll and fraud for pointing out what a hypocrite
you are.

Nope. You're a trolling fraud. But I'm not a hypocrite. I don't spam.

You're the one who claims that off topic = spam, not me.

Wrong again, troll.
Liar.


It sure does to those ISP's who have canceled accounts due to the
complaints.

Liar.




Oh, and don't forget:


Jerry claims suing is illegal

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

You'd like that, wouldn't you? But I don't need to sue you. There
are other ways to handle people like you. I prefer the legal ways.



Jerry on websites:

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:57:07 -0500, Jerry Stuckle

>
> Go for it, dipshit. I've been called far worse. My employer is
> DataBasix.com. OOPS! Too bad for you.
>

Oh, you mean the one who can't even keep a website running?
ROFLMAO!

While also saying

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

WRONG ANSWER, FRAUD. It has been and is registered. You just
can't find a web page for it. Sorry, troll.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

 

[Gary L. Burnore]

Gary L. Burnore wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:57:07 -0500, Jerry Stuckle

Gary L. Burnore wrote:
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:00:21 -0500, Jerry Stuckle

Gary L. Burnore wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:26:11 -0500, Gary L. Burnore

On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:49:31 -0500, Jerry Stuckle

Dick Gaughan wrote:
In <[email protected]> on Thu, 03 Jan
2008 14:03:11 -0500, Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
wrote:

Dick Gaughan wrote:
In <C3A2D429.F13D%[email protected]> on Thu, 03 Jan 2008

I don't get it. Why was the original post spam?
It wasn't. It was many things, including being a
pathetically-badly disguised festering heap of marketing shite,
but it wasn't spam.

Those insisting it was spam are merely flaunting their
cluelessness. A post is *only* defined as being spam when it
breaches the Breidbart Index. Nobody has provided any evidence
that that particular bit of midge's effluence has exceeded the BI.

The Breidbart Index is woefully out of date.
When was that decided? I must have missed that debate.

It's been dismissed as virtually meaningless for quite a while, now.
SPAM has changed, but the index hasn't.

In a.w.w, ads of any kind are considered SPAM.
What aww might or might not consider is about as relevant outside
aww as a spider's fart. I'm not reading this thread in aww.

Fine. I am reading this in a.w.w., and it is spam here.

The BI was adopted as a way of avoiding would-be Usenet vigilantes
deciding to classify posts as spam on the basis that they disliked
the contents. This discussion shows that the wisdom of that
concern still has relevance.

So you have some meaningless, out of date measurement which doesn't say
something is spam or not, but only classifies the severity of the SPAM.

Right. Try again.

Until someone else comes up with a better content-blind objective
definition of spam, the BI is still the benchmark.

There is. The charter and/or FAQs for the newsgroup. And the FAQs for
a.w.w., which were agreed to by the majority of the regulars here,
classify this as spam.

LIA[SLAP]
FAQs aren't charters and are not enforceable. Charters in unmoderated
alt gorups are also uninforceable. Off charter in comp groups, on the
other hand, is something that can get your news provider's attention.
My bad - didn't look first at the group list. While perfectly
acceptable in AWW, in a comp group you're right in that its off
charter which *is* enforcable. Perhaps the zealots in AWW should
attempt to have it reclassified into a group that has an official
charter, but in the meantime nobody cares )
There's really no such thing as a valid charter in an alt.* group.
Alt.config is a bogus group of morons who want to turn alt into
another form of big8 groups. Never gonna happen. Of course,
moderated groups can and do control content but non-moderated groups
are freeform. Stukkie will just have to learn to use a killfile
there.

Nevertheless, please accept my apologies for the mistake.
Accepted. Unfortunately, Jerry won't stop crossposting back to
comp.*.
Sorry, Gary.
Liar.

Let's see you prove that statement, Gary.
You're doing it for me, Jerry. YOU are still posting to comp.lang.php
and he's not "making you do it". YOU are the one posting off charter.
YOU. Not him.

And your posts are on topic? ROFLMAO! Pot-Kettle-Black.

How's that ignoring me thing going, stukkie? OOPS, did you LIE again?

ROFLMAO! Keep it up, troll!

Hahahahaha. DataBasix isn't a WEBSITE, dumbass.

Nope, but you can't keep a website up. ROFLMAO!

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

WRONG ANSWER, FRAUD. It has been and is registered. You just
can't find a web page for it. Sorry, troll.

Not at all. I don't have to. Too many others have exposed you for the
troll you are.
Coward.


Projecting again, Troll?

Jerry claims suing is illegal

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

You'd like that, wouldn't you? But I don't need to sue you. There
are other ways to handle people like you. I prefer the legal ways.



Jerry on websites:

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:57:07 -0500, Jerry Stuckle

>
> Go for it, dipshit. I've been called far worse. My employer is
> DataBasix.com. OOPS! Too bad for you.
>

Oh, you mean the one who can't even keep a website running?
ROFLMAO!

While also saying

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

WRONG ANSWER, FRAUD. It has been and is registered. You just
can't find a web page for it. Sorry, troll.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

 

[Gary L. Burnore]

Anybody fancy a pint?

Tapping a Guinness now. Thanks!

--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

 

[Jerry Stuckle]

Liar.


Oh, and while you're ignoring me, how do you like the new .sig
material?

You really need to learn to read.

Jerry claims suing is illegal

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

You'd like that, wouldn't you? But I don't need to sue you. There
are other ways to handle people like you. I prefer the legal ways.

That is not a claim that suing is illegal. Learn to read, dipshit.

Jerry on websites:

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>


Oh, you mean the one who can't even keep a website running?
ROFLMAO!

While also saying

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

WRONG ANSWER, FRAUD. It has been and is registered. You just
can't find a web page for it. Sorry, troll.

Nope, I don't have a public website for the business. My business
caters to a few large companies. They know how to contact me, and I'm
not looking for other work.

But actually, yes, there is a website for it. However, it's private and
password protected. Those who need to know about it do.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
(e-mail address removed)
==================

 

[Jerry Stuckle]

Jerry claims suing is illegal

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

You'd like that, wouldn't you? But I don't need to sue you. There
are other ways to handle people like you. I prefer the legal ways.

And nothing there claims suing is illegal. But you can't understand
basic English, troll.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
(e-mail address removed)
==================

 

[Jerry Stuckle]

Another pkb! Neat, stukkie.


Jerry claims suing is illegal

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

You'd like that, wouldn't you? But I don't need to sue you. There
are
other ways to handle people like you. I prefer the legal ways.



Jerry on websites:

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>


Oh, you mean the one who can't even keep a website running?
ROFLMAO!

While also saying

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

WRONG ANSWER, FRAUD. It has been and is registered. You just
can't
find a web page for it. Sorry, troll.

Yep, if you were so all powerful, you could find the website. You could
even get access to it. But you can't troll. And it galls you to no
end. Because it proves just how powerless you really are.

And you can't even understand basic ENGLISH. Back to first grade for
you, troll.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
(e-mail address removed)
==================

 

[Gary L. Burnore]

That is not a claim that suing is illegal. Learn to read, dipshit.

Then what is it, Jerry? Come on, explain your way out if that
statement if you think you can.

I predict a non-sequitur here.

Nope, I don't have a public website for the business. My business
caters to a few large companies. They know how to contact me, and I'm
not looking for other work.

But actually, yes, there is a website for it. However, it's private and
password protected. Those who need to know about it do.

You really are thick, aren't you, Jerry? You're the one who claims I
can't keep a website running. All of the sites we host and our own
sites are all up. You just can't figure it out, can you?

--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

 

[Gary L. Burnore]

And nothing there claims suing is illegal. But you can't understand
basic English, troll.

Your inference states otherwise, Jerry.


Jerry claims suing is illegal

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

You'd like that, wouldn't you? But I don't need to sue you. There
are other ways to handle people like you. I prefer the legal ways.



Jerry on websites:

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:57:07 -0500, Jerry Stuckle

>
> Go for it, dipshit. I've been called far worse. My employer is
> DataBasix.com. OOPS! Too bad for you.
>

Oh, you mean the one who can't even keep a website running?
ROFLMAO!

While also saying

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

WRONG ANSWER, FRAUD. It has been and is registered. You just
can't find a web page for it. Sorry, troll.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

 

[Gary L. Burnore]

Yep, if you were so all powerful, you could find the website.

Find what website? Who's looking? Who cares?

Jerry claims suing is illegal

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

You'd like that, wouldn't you? But I don't need to sue you. There
are other ways to handle people like you. I prefer the legal ways.



Jerry on websites:

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

> On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:57:07 -0500, Jerry Stuckle

>
> Go for it, dipshit. I've been called far worse. My employer is
> DataBasix.com. OOPS! Too bad for you.
>

Oh, you mean the one who can't even keep a website running?
ROFLMAO!

While also saying

From: Jerry Stuckle <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

WRONG ANSWER, FRAUD. It has been and is registered. You just
can't find a web page for it. Sorry, troll.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================