Let's Start

[Sujay]

http://sujaywa.blogspot.com

 

[Uno]

http://sujaywa.blogspot.com

That's an interesting page, Sujay. You might be the Indian Jacob Navia.
(I hope you don't get thrown to the floor as often as he.)

http://i45.tinypic.com/wrxsh3.png

I don't know whether I've lumbered into a troll's nest, so I'll ask what
the role of the purple toolbar is.
--
Uno

implicit none

real :: wellhead_depth, feet_per_atmos, atmos
real :: city_pressure, atmos_per_psi, atmos2
real :: depth

! values
wellhead_depth = 5000
! source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepwater_Horizon_oil_spill
feet_per_atmos = 32.808399169
city_pressure = 65
! typical water pressure in lb/in^2, aka, psi
atmos_per_psi = 70.307E-3
! source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_(unit)

! calculations
atmos = wellhead_depth / feet_per_atmos
! units: ft / (ft/atm) = atm
atmos2 = city_pressure * atmos_per_psi
! units: psi * (atm/psi) = atm
depth = feet_per_atmos*atmos2
! units: (ft/atm) * atm = ft

!output
print *, "The hydrostatic pressure at the wellhead is ", atmos
print *, "city_pressure is ", city_pressure
print *, "atmos2 is ", atmos2
print *, "depth is ", depth
endprogram
! gfortran -Wall -Wextra p2.f90 -o out.exe

 

[Nick Keighley]

Sujay wrote:

That's an interesting page, Sujay.  You might be the Indian Jacob Navia..
  (I hope you don't get thrown to the floor as often as he.)

http://i45.tinypic.com/wrxsh3.png

I don't know whether I've lumbered into a troll's nest, so I'll ask what
the role of the purple toolbar is.

it looks like pure spam to me

--
Uno

implicit none

real :: wellhead_depth, feet_per_atmos, atmos
real :: city_pressure, atmos_per_psi, atmos2
real :: depth

! values
wellhead_depth = 5000
! source:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepwater_Horizon_oil_spill
feet_per_atmos = 32.808399169
city_pressure = 65
! typical water pressure in lb/in^2, aka, psi
atmos_per_psi = 70.307E-3
! source:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_(unit)

! calculations
atmos = wellhead_depth / feet_per_atmos
! units:  ft / (ft/atm) = atm
atmos2 = city_pressure * atmos_per_psi
! units: psi * (atm/psi) = atm
depth = feet_per_atmos*atmos2
! units: (ft/atm) * atm = ft

!output
print *, "The hydrostatic pressure at the wellhead is ", atmos
print *, "city_pressure is ", city_pressure
print *, "atmos2 is ", atmos2
print *, "depth is ", depth
endprogram
! gfortran  -Wall -Wextra p2.f90  -o out.exe

THIS is your .sig??!

 

[Uno]

Scuba divers can do it in their heads.

33ft/ATA 5000 foot depth, 5000/33 = 151.5 ATA
10m/ATA 1524 meter depth, 1524/10 = 152 ATA

What the ****, Nick, you're the only person in my clc killfile.

I seem to be the person who quotes books maybe more than others. This
belies my usual motivation to solve problems that get thrown my way.

Fortran is my lingua germana, while C is my lingua franca. I try to
bring computational, mathematical methods to bear on problems I can't
avoid. I cannot, as a person with drilling experience, trade
experience, a deep physics and mathematical background, and plenty to
lose with failure, sit on the sidelines.

http://i50.tinypic.com/11qs7b8.png

The solution I'm thinking of is not different than integrating a star,
which we did as seniors in physics, but the problem is that I took an
"F" in that class. THe Berlin was falling, and I couldn't be bothered
by places where the sun shone.

Stellar Evolution. Ptak, the instructor, had his Ph.D signed by Hans Bethe.

Not many people know about the conversation between him and Pres.
Eisenhour before the latter authorized lighting the fuse on the H bomb.

 

[Nick Keighley]

What the ****, Nick, you're the only person in my clc killfile.

good. I'm still curious as to why you posted it.

I seem to be the person who quotes books maybe more than others.  This
belies my usual motivation to solve problems that get thrown my way.

but why tag a fortran(?) code fragment onto a posting to clc? And one
that appeared to have nothing to do with the thread? I mean the link
in Sujay's post didn't mention diving.

Fortran is my lingua germana, while C is my lingua franca.  I try to
bring computational, mathematical methods to bear on problems I can't
avoid.  I cannot, as a person with drilling experience, trade
experience, a deep physics and mathematical background, and plenty to
lose with failure, sit on the sidelines.

http://i50.tinypic.com/11qs7b8.png

what the **** has any of that got to do with C?

The solution I'm thinking of is not different than integrating a star,
which we did as seniors in physics, but the problem is that I took an
"F" in that class.  THe Berlin was falling, and I couldn't be bothered
by places where the sun shone.

Stellar Evolution.  Ptak, the instructor, had his Ph.D signed by Hans Bethe.

Not many people know about the conversation between him and Pres.
Eisenhour before the latter authorized lighting the fuse on the H bomb.

have you been drinking?

 

[Seebs]

I seem to be the person who quotes books maybe more than others.

You also seem to change your posting name maybe more often than others. I
think this is at least the third or fourth name I've seen posting the exact
same sort of material, with similar interests, topics, writing style, and
tendency to cut and paste large blocks of stuff.

Why do you keep changing your nym? The first one was fine.

-s

 

[Seebs]

have you been drinking?

He writes an awful lot like phred aka frank, and so far as I can tell, he's
just always been like that.

-s

 

[Richard Bos]

On 8 June, 11:17, Uno <[email protected]> wrote:

^^^^^^^^^^^^^
*************
!NOTA BENE!
*************

have you been drinking?

No, it has always been an idiot, in this no less than in previous
incarnations.

Furrfu.

Richard

 

[Uno]

He writes an awful lot like phred aka frank, and so far as I can tell, he's
just always been like that.

-s

Seebs, you're a nice guy, but I'd rather be in your killfile than not.

And, yes, when I come home from karaoke, I've been drinking.

I walk.
==
frank

 

[Uno]

You also seem to change your posting name maybe more often than others. I
think this is at least the third or fourth name I've seen posting the exact
same sort of material, with similar interests, topics, writing style, and
tendency to cut and paste large blocks of stuff.

Why do you keep changing your nym? The first one was fine.

-s

In comp.unix.programmer, they said that actual e-mail was better than a nym.

 

[Uno]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^
*************
!NOTA BENE!
*************

Are you fascists?

No, it has always been an idiot, in this no less than in previous
incarnations.

Furrfu.

Richard

Richard,

Je noemt me een "zij", maar ik heb om mijn volk te brengen ten einde.
(Je bent niet een van hen.)
Ik mis snaaking plaat met mijn volk. Mijn volk, +waaronder+ kerken, zal
antwoorden.

Je hoeft niet staan in mijn manier krijgt u in de manier waarop ik kan.

MPJ
--

Richard,

Du nennst mich ein "es", aber ich muss mein Volk in Ordnung in bringen.
(Du bist nicht einer von ihnen.)
Ich vermisse snaaking plaat mit meinen Leuten. Mein Volk, samt Kirchen,
*wird* reagieren.

Steh Du nicht in meiner Wege, Du Mir im Weg Stehende.

Typ,

Jens

 

[Seebs]

Seebs, you're a nice guy, but I'd rather be in your killfile than not.

So why do you change your posting handle so often? If you'd stick with
a consistent handle, people who don't like your posts wouldn't respond to
them. If you keep changing your handle, you'll keep annoying people who've
already killfiled you a few times, and you'll pick up complaints about the
same behaviors over and over.

-s

 

[Seebs]

In comp.unix.programmer, they said that actual e-mail was better than a nym.

That doesn't explain why you've changed it *repeatedly*.

-s

 

[Ed]

What the ****, Nick, you're the only person in my clc killfile.

The f-word is allowed in here? (Obviously rhetorical). Rants on the
degradation of humanity will surely follow (for nothing seems off-topic
in here).

 

[Ed]

Everything is allowed in here (subject to local civil and criminal
legislation), but you can't force people to read your stuff. If you
post stuff they don't want to read, eventually they'll stop reading
your stuff. If you don't care about whether people read your stuff, why
post? So it makes sense at least to make the attempt to use language
that people are prepared to read. Some people (such as myself) prefer
not to read articles by people who, whether because they suffer from a
hideous vocabulary deficiency or through a misguided and rather
pathetic attempt at being offensive, feel obliged to resort to
expletives. Not everyone shares this preference, but there seems to be
a general negative correlation between good, readable articles and
liberal use of expletive.

Translation: swearing on Usenet is not actually illegal, but it's not a
good way to persuade people to take you seriously.


Alas, there is far too much that is off-topic in here.

Thanks for confirming to me that this "group" is "all over the map". I
have a solution, but I'm too poor to tell yaz about it.