Keith Thompson said:
Chris Hills said:
However in other parts of the world being associated with the Taliban
is great praise and suggesting they are a "yank" would be a major
insult.
[snip]
Chris, I know you've advocated broadening the topicality guidelines
for comp.lang.c, but this is ridiculous. Perhaps this thread would be
topical in alt.beat.dead.horse.
I've been reading clc all night, as it is, for me, output:
date is Sat, 29 Dec 2007 10:13:09 +0000 (UTC)time is
1198923189from is
(e-mail address removed)-cnrc.gc.ca (Walter Roberson)date is Sat, 29 Dec 2007
09:53:11 +0000 (UTC)time is
1198921991from is
"Joachim Schmitz" <
[email protected]>date is Sat, 29 Dec 2007
09:22:20 +0000 (UTC)time is
1198920140from is
tropics <
[email protected]>date is Sat, 29 Dec 2007 09:19:20 +0000
(UTC)time is
1198919960from is
James Fang <
[email protected]>date is Sat, 29 Dec 2007
03:14:50 -0600time is
1198919690from is
"Malcolm McLean" <
[email protected]>date is Sat, 29 Dec 2007 08:57:29
+0000 (UTC)time is
1198918649from is
Chris Hills <
[email protected]>date is Sat, 29 Dec 2007 02:51:13 -0600time
is
1198918273from is
Richard Heathfield <
[email protected]>date is Sat, 29 Dec 2007 08:27:27
+0000 (UTC)time is
You never admit of the off-brand uses for C, as ISO doesn't have a section
for it. When the Bush admin was forced to announce that it had been spying
on its citizens using so-called data-mining, I thought it only too relevant
to C, but you stopped me dead in my tracks with the objection of topicality.
What other language would you impugn with this felonious behavior?
One other thing: why don't you show up on my radar like everyone else?