Rotating pix with CLSID:B6FFC24C-7E13-11D0-9B47-00C04FC2F51D in IE7

[no.reply7]

I used script CLSID:B6FFC24C-7E13-11D0-9B47-00C04FC2F51D to rotate an
image but it does not seem to work in internet explore 7. Does anyone
know a work around?

 

[VK]

I used script CLSID:B6FFC24C-7E13-11D0-9B47-00C04FC2F51D to rotate an
image but it does not seem to work in internet explore 7. Does anyone
know a work around?

Actually it shouldn't work in IE6 neither AFAIK. That's an ancient
/ActiveX/ (not a /script/) from the DirectAnimation set. Microsoft
abandonned all this stuff for SMIL a while ago.

If you want to turn or otherwise twist something around, use the Matrix
filter:
<http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/filter/reference/filters/matrix.asp>

All this IE only.

 

[Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn]

Actually it shouldn't work in IE6 neither AFAIK.

Since it has been established here (in cljs) already that you do not know
much about Web-based software development, if anything at all, let alone
understanding it (you are just pretending that you do), that is not a very
strong argument.

That's an ancient /ActiveX/ (not a /script/) from the DirectAnimation set.

ActiveX is a technology. It is a class ID for an ActiveX/COM _object_,
and it is not ancient at all.

Microsoft abandonned all this stuff for SMIL a while ago.

Nonsense. Maybe they have deprecated it, but that does not mean in any way
that it is suddenly no longer supported.

If you want to turn or otherwise twist something around, use the Matrix
filter:

All this IE only.

Regarding browsers, true. However unsurprisingly, this is not using SMIL at
all, but DirectX, of which DirectAnimation is a subset.


PointedEars

 

[VK]

Since it has been established here (in cljs) already that you do not know
much about Web-based software development, if anything at all, let alone
understanding it (you are just pretending that you do), that is not a very
strong argument.

I understand that you just came back from your vacations and urgently
need some warming-up hits to get the shape back. Yet could you try to
retrieve it in less funny way?
</OT>