A
Ash
Karl said:
597 and counting. I'm competing against Satan. And winning.
Just kidding.
597 and counting. I'm competing against Satan. And winning.
Just kidding.
K
Kris
Ash said:
Thanks for mentioning.
A
Ash
Philip said:
This philosy is the basis of Linux, you OE wanker.
E
Eric B. Bednarz
Toby Inkster said:
Well, I don't want to overstress the value of my little joke, but I
don't quite grok the relevance of that spec's prose concerning marked
sections for general entity (declarations|references). Entity
references are even commonly used in productive document instance sets,
BTW. Admittedly within boring limits.
E
Eric B. Bednarz
Sam Hughes said:
In syntactical terms, a document type definition is the sum of the
external and internal declaration subsets dumped in the document type
declaration, downwards the declared root element type, applicable for
exactly that one document instance all of them were found in.
There's no way to invoke the specification (or even its syntactical
part) within a document instance (not that this is relevant for the
matter in any way
.Just because you have
some SGMLism that makes a document parse with the validator does not mean
that it's HTML.
Since HTML calls itself quite normatively an 'SGML application' all of
the 'isms apply (and are authoritatively defined in ISO8879--there's no
'convention' trapdoor that allows for the magician leaving the stage
whenever he sees fit).
No, thanks (BTDT).
L
Leif K-Brooks
Ash said:First of all, I'm assuming that you index is in the form of a table. If
it isn't, amke it one, it looks nicer
list of JavaScript commands, like so:
document.write("</table class='myclass'>");
document.write("<tr><th>HOME</th></tr>");
...
...
document.write("</table>");
Then, place the above code into a /js file. Then, wherever you want a
table, just put:
<script type="JavaScript" src="table.js"></script>
Or something along those lines.
I hate to feed trolls, but you might actually mislead someone.
There's no way to know the precise value, but most estimates say that
around 10% of users don't have Javascript support, or turn it off.
Making Javascript support a requirement of your web site is sort of like
turning off your web server for a month every year.
And no, you shouldn't be using tables for layout in the first place. A
layout is not tabular data.
A
Adrienne
Gazing into my crystal ball I observed Mark Parnell
You know, with all the plugins available, and new ones being written all
the time, maybe there is no need to update the core program. Maybe
they're just not fixing what's not broken.
You know, with all the plugins available, and new ones being written all
the time, maybe there is no need to update the core program. Maybe
they're just not fixing what's not broken.
M
Mark Parnell
[HTML-Kit]
Maybe. Perhaps I should take another look at all the plugins. There are
a couple of things in the core program that annoy me, that I don't think
can be fixed via plugins (though I'm happy to be proved wrong!), but you
may be right.
Maybe. Perhaps I should take another look at all the plugins. There are
a couple of things in the core program that annoy me, that I don't think
can be fixed via plugins (though I'm happy to be proved wrong!), but you
may be right.
M
Mark Parnell
Looks like Miranda is interested, brucie! ;-)
M
Mark Parnell
She did. Your point?
K
Karl Groves
Mark Parnell said:
Take pictures!
--
Karl Core
Link of the day: http://216.127.86.74/dubyaresume.com/
http://www.karlcore.com
http://www.usabilityinfo.com
http://www.murderthestupid.com
S
SpaceGirl
Karl said:
He's a he, and by definition not my type. Sorry I prefer girls!
(Now when is Els getting back!???)
--
x theSpaceGirl (miranda)
# lead designer @ http://www.dhnewmedia.com #
# remove NO SPAM to email, or use form on website #
A
Ash
Mark said:
No she didn't. She responded to the original post I'm talking about
SpaceGirl. You can't use a news reader, either. Now you're the dumbass,
dumbass.
M
Mark Parnell
Maybe your newsreader screwed the threading up but it appeared correctly
here.
No, she responded to your post the second time you sent it. From the
headers in her post:
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
The original post was said:
Then how am I sending these messages?
Hmmm. Very intelligent. *plonk*
R
rf
Then how do you explain this?
http://users.bigpond.net.au/rf/dumbass.gif
The highlighted post is yours. Spacegirl responded to it.
Perhaps you are using a dumbass newsreader
S
Sam Hughes
Then how do you explain this?
http://users.bigpond.net.au/rf/dumbass.gif
The highlighted post is yours. Spacegirl responded to it.
Perhaps you are using a dumbass newsreader
Be careful:
Ash said:
He's getting a bit too well-nourished
W
Webcastmaker
Your resume did not reflect the skill set the companys were looking
for? "Over qualified" just means one did not do their homework about
the company and the job.
When we interview new people, we ask them leading questions about our
company to see if they even bothered to see what we did. We are only
interested in people that took enough interest in the position to do
a little research about our company.
A
Ash
Jesus, anything is better than OE, you wanker.rf said:Then how do you explain this?
http://users.bigpond.net.au/rf/dumbass.gif
The highlighted post is yours. Spacegirl responded to it.
Perhaps you are using a dumbass newsreader
+Original Post
|
....
....
+-+My original post
| |
| +Leif K-Brooks Reply to my original post
|
+SpaceGirl's Reply to me, but to Cogito's Original post
....
....
you dumbass wanker
A
Ash
BTW, you OE wanker, I use Firefox and Thunderbird exclusivly on a FedoraAsh said:
Core 2 system.
W
Webcastmaker
Was it necessary to quote 56 lines just to say this?