Does .NET provide any mechanism to replace ActiveX controls on web???

  • Thread starter Muhammad Shuaib Anjum
  • Start date
M

Muhammad Shuaib Anjum

Hi,

Is there any mechanism in .NET Framework which can help me to replace
activex controls on my web page??

As activex controls need to be downloaded on the client machine, and
my clients are not interested in downloading any such binaries to
their machines for a bunch of reasons, including the consumption of
bandwidth as a strong one.

Like, by the virtue of .NET framework, can I acheive the functionality
of a "Tree Control" on my web page, without using/downloading the
ActiveX Tree Control??

Looking forward ...

Regards,
Muhammad Shuaib
 
J

Jim Cheshire [MSFT]

Hi Muhammad,

There are a ton of TreeView controls for ASP.NET, including one that we
have in the IE Webcontrols package. (Our is not supported by us, but it is
available on www.asp.net.)

Jim Cheshire [MSFT]
MCP+I, MCSE, MCSD, MCDBA
Microsoft Developer Support
(e-mail address removed)

This post is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties and confers no rights.

--------------------
 
M

Muhammad Shuaib Anjum

Hi Jim,

Thanks for writing, but I qouted tree control just as example, infact
I wanted to know that on the helm of .NET framework, which would be
obviously installed on client machine as well, can I enjoy the
flexibillity that AxtiveX controls provide while programming, without
using them?

Is Microsoft looking to extend the IE Web Controls package, so that
developers may have some more controls to play with, on client side,
without bothering the bandwidth consupmtion caused by downloading
activex controls? Or if there exists some abstraction for Web Controls
( like Tree Control, or Toolbar control )that a developer can inherit
to develop some custom controls, like developing a Web Control (and
not an ActiveX one) to play a ticker for news which are being updated
on the timeout of a minute from a data source on my web-server???
(again this is just an example and not my requirement :)

Looking forward ...

Regards
Muhammad Shuaib


Hi Muhammad,

There are a ton of TreeView controls for ASP.NET, including one that we
have in the IE Webcontrols package. (Our is not supported by us, but it is
available on www.asp.net.)

Jim Cheshire [MSFT]
MCP+I, MCSE, MCSD, MCDBA
Microsoft Developer Support
(e-mail address removed)

This post is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties and confers no rights.

--------------------
From: (e-mail address removed) (Muhammad Shuaib Anjum)
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols
Subject: Does .NET provide any mechanism to replace ActiveX controls on web???
Date: 11 Aug 2004 22:29:45 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.163.95.196
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1092288585 8775 127.0.0.1 (12 Aug 2004 05:29:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: (e-mail address removed)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 05:29:45 +0000 (UTC)
Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.s
ul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!proxad.net!postnews2.google.
com!not-for-mail
Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols:11065
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols

Hi,

Is there any mechanism in .NET Framework which can help me to replace
activex controls on my web page??

As activex controls need to be downloaded on the client machine, and
my clients are not interested in downloading any such binaries to
their machines for a bunch of reasons, including the consumption of
bandwidth as a strong one.

Like, by the virtue of .NET framework, can I acheive the functionality
of a "Tree Control" on my web page, without using/downloading the
ActiveX Tree Control??

Looking forward ...

Regards,
Muhammad Shuaib
 
J

Jim Cheshire [MSFT]

Muhammad,

You need to be more specific in order for me to give you more specifics,
but I will say that you can use Windows Forms controls hosted in Internet
Explorer if you wish. The stipulation is that the .NET Framework exists on
the client, and there is some minor configuration required for the runtime
security policy in order to make it work correctly.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;305624

Keep in mind that this is outside of my area of expertise. I'm not a
client-side guy.

Are we looking to extend the Web controls package? Kind of and kind of
not. We are not going to extend what you currently have, but we have added
a whole slew of very cool controls to Visual Studio .NET 2005, some of
which are the same control types that you have available to you in the
current Web controls.

Jim Cheshire [MSFT]
MCP+I, MCSE, MCSD, MCDBA
Microsoft Developer Support
(e-mail address removed)

This post is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties and confers no rights.

--------------------
From: (e-mail address removed) (Muhammad Shuaib Anjum)
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols
Subject: Re: Does .NET provide any mechanism to replace ActiveX controls on web???
Date: 12 Aug 2004 22:14:20 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 81
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.163.95.196
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1092374088 11789 127.0.0.1 (13 Aug 2004 05:14:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: (e-mail address removed)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 05:14:48 +0000 (UTC)
Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!news-out.cwi
x.com!news-out!newsfeed.cwix.com!easynet-monga!easynet.net!news.glorb.com!po
stnews2.google.com!not-for-mail
Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols:11074
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols

Hi Jim,

Thanks for writing, but I qouted tree control just as example, infact
I wanted to know that on the helm of .NET framework, which would be
obviously installed on client machine as well, can I enjoy the
flexibillity that AxtiveX controls provide while programming, without
using them?

Is Microsoft looking to extend the IE Web Controls package, so that
developers may have some more controls to play with, on client side,
without bothering the bandwidth consupmtion caused by downloading
activex controls? Or if there exists some abstraction for Web Controls
( like Tree Control, or Toolbar control )that a developer can inherit
to develop some custom controls, like developing a Web Control (and
not an ActiveX one) to play a ticker for news which are being updated
on the timeout of a minute from a data source on my web-server???
(again this is just an example and not my requirement :)

Looking forward ...

Regards
Muhammad Shuaib


(e-mail address removed) (Jim Cheshire [MSFT]) wrote in message
Hi Muhammad,

There are a ton of TreeView controls for ASP.NET, including one that we
have in the IE Webcontrols package. (Our is not supported by us, but it is
available on www.asp.net.)

Jim Cheshire [MSFT]
MCP+I, MCSE, MCSD, MCDBA
Microsoft Developer Support
(e-mail address removed)

This post is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties and confers no rights.

--------------------
From: (e-mail address removed) (Muhammad Shuaib Anjum)
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols
Subject: Does .NET provide any mechanism to replace ActiveX controls on web???
Date: 11 Aug 2004 22:29:45 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.163.95.196
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1092288585 8775 127.0.0.1 (12 Aug 2004 05:29:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: (e-mail address removed)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 05:29:45 +0000 (UTC)
Path:
cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.s
ul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!proxad.net!postnews2.google.
com!not-for-mail
Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols:11065
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols

Hi,

Is there any mechanism in .NET Framework which can help me to replace
activex controls on my web page??

As activex controls need to be downloaded on the client machine, and
my clients are not interested in downloading any such binaries to
their machines for a bunch of reasons, including the consumption of
bandwidth as a strong one.

Like, by the virtue of .NET framework, can I acheive the functionality
of a "Tree Control" on my web page, without using/downloading the
ActiveX Tree Control??

Looking forward ...

Regards,
Muhammad Shuaib
 
M

Muhammad Shuaib Anjum

Hi Jim,

Well being specific is that my company already have a browser-based
client which runs an activex in the browser window, to provide
interactive UI to the user. But by the virtue of activex :(, it takes
a bunch of bandwidth, while downloading to users's machine.

What we are looking foroward is to see if .NET Framework provide some
magic which can be used to replace our ActiveX, and hence save user's
bandwidth, without sacrificing any functionality. Obviously there can
be some compromise but that should b minimized to 1-5 %.

See if you can provide some details, or as you said you are not an
expert of this, see if you can name somebody from Microsoft, who can
be helpful in this regard.

Looking forward ...

Regards,
Muhammad Shuaib.


Muhammad,

You need to be more specific in order for me to give you more specifics,
but I will say that you can use Windows Forms controls hosted in Internet
Explorer if you wish. The stipulation is that the .NET Framework exists on
the client, and there is some minor configuration required for the runtime
security policy in order to make it work correctly.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;305624

Keep in mind that this is outside of my area of expertise. I'm not a
client-side guy.

Are we looking to extend the Web controls package? Kind of and kind of
not. We are not going to extend what you currently have, but we have added
a whole slew of very cool controls to Visual Studio .NET 2005, some of
which are the same control types that you have available to you in the
current Web controls.

Jim Cheshire [MSFT]
MCP+I, MCSE, MCSD, MCDBA
Microsoft Developer Support
(e-mail address removed)

This post is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties and confers no rights.

--------------------
From: (e-mail address removed) (Muhammad Shuaib Anjum)
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols
Subject: Re: Does .NET provide any mechanism to replace ActiveX controls on web???
Date: 12 Aug 2004 22:14:20 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 81
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.163.95.196
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1092374088 11789 127.0.0.1 (13 Aug 2004 05:14:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: (e-mail address removed)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 05:14:48 +0000 (UTC)
Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!news-out.cwi
x.com!news-out!newsfeed.cwix.com!easynet-monga!easynet.net!news.glorb.com!po
stnews2.google.com!not-for-mail
Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols:11074
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols

Hi Jim,

Thanks for writing, but I qouted tree control just as example, infact
I wanted to know that on the helm of .NET framework, which would be
obviously installed on client machine as well, can I enjoy the
flexibillity that AxtiveX controls provide while programming, without
using them?

Is Microsoft looking to extend the IE Web Controls package, so that
developers may have some more controls to play with, on client side,
without bothering the bandwidth consupmtion caused by downloading
activex controls? Or if there exists some abstraction for Web Controls
( like Tree Control, or Toolbar control )that a developer can inherit
to develop some custom controls, like developing a Web Control (and
not an ActiveX one) to play a ticker for news which are being updated
on the timeout of a minute from a data source on my web-server???
(again this is just an example and not my requirement :)

Looking forward ...

Regards
Muhammad Shuaib


(e-mail address removed) (Jim Cheshire [MSFT]) wrote in message
Hi Muhammad,

There are a ton of TreeView controls for ASP.NET, including one that we
have in the IE Webcontrols package. (Our is not supported by us, but it is
available on www.asp.net.)

Jim Cheshire [MSFT]
MCP+I, MCSE, MCSD, MCDBA
Microsoft Developer Support
(e-mail address removed)

This post is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties and confers no rights.

--------------------
From: (e-mail address removed) (Muhammad Shuaib Anjum)
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols
Subject: Does .NET provide any mechanism to replace ActiveX controls on web???
Date: 11 Aug 2004 22:29:45 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.163.95.196
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1092288585 8775 127.0.0.1 (12 Aug 2004 05:29:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: (e-mail address removed)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 05:29:45 +0000 (UTC)
Path:
cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.s
ul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!proxad.net!postnews2.google.
com!not-for-mail
Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols:11065
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols

Hi,

Is there any mechanism in .NET Framework which can help me to replace
activex controls on my web page??

As activex controls need to be downloaded on the client machine, and
my clients are not interested in downloading any such binaries to
their machines for a bunch of reasons, including the consumption of
bandwidth as a strong one.

Like, by the virtue of .NET framework, can I acheive the functionality
of a "Tree Control" on my web page, without using/downloading the
ActiveX Tree Control??

Looking forward ...

Regards,
Muhammad Shuaib
 
J

Jim Cheshire [MSFT]

Muhammad,

What you are asking is not possible. You have an ActiveX control that runs
on the client. In order for that to happen, the control has to be
downloaded to the client.

You want to replace that with a control in .NET that provides for the same
functionality and is a thin-client with no postback. Therefore, you have
to download something to the client that will provide that. However, your
requirement is that you remove the reliance on downloading anything.

There is no way to do this.

Jim Cheshire [MSFT]
MCP+I, MCSE, MCSD, MCDBA
Microsoft Developer Support
(e-mail address removed)

This post is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties and confers no rights.

--------------------
From: (e-mail address removed) (Muhammad Shuaib Anjum)
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols
Subject: Re: Does .NET provide any mechanism to replace ActiveX controls on web???
Date: 15 Aug 2004 00:04:21 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 161
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.82.53.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1092553462 17782 127.0.0.1 (15 Aug 2004 07:04:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: (e-mail address removed)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 07:04:22 +0000 (UTC)
Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.s
ul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!p
ostnews2.google.com!not-for-mail
Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols:11095
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols

Hi Jim,

Well being specific is that my company already have a browser-based
client which runs an activex in the browser window, to provide
interactive UI to the user. But by the virtue of activex :(, it takes
a bunch of bandwidth, while downloading to users's machine.

What we are looking foroward is to see if .NET Framework provide some
magic which can be used to replace our ActiveX, and hence save user's
bandwidth, without sacrificing any functionality. Obviously there can
be some compromise but that should b minimized to 1-5 %.

See if you can provide some details, or as you said you are not an
expert of this, see if you can name somebody from Microsoft, who can
be helpful in this regard.

Looking forward ...

Regards,
Muhammad Shuaib.


(e-mail address removed) (Jim Cheshire [MSFT]) wrote in message
Muhammad,

You need to be more specific in order for me to give you more specifics,
but I will say that you can use Windows Forms controls hosted in Internet
Explorer if you wish. The stipulation is that the .NET Framework exists on
the client, and there is some minor configuration required for the runtime
security policy in order to make it work correctly.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;305624

Keep in mind that this is outside of my area of expertise. I'm not a
client-side guy.

Are we looking to extend the Web controls package? Kind of and kind of
not. We are not going to extend what you currently have, but we have added
a whole slew of very cool controls to Visual Studio .NET 2005, some of
which are the same control types that you have available to you in the
current Web controls.

Jim Cheshire [MSFT]
MCP+I, MCSE, MCSD, MCDBA
Microsoft Developer Support
(e-mail address removed)

This post is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties and confers no rights.

--------------------
From: (e-mail address removed) (Muhammad Shuaib Anjum)
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols
Subject: Re: Does .NET provide any mechanism to replace ActiveX
controls
on web???
Date: 12 Aug 2004 22:14:20 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 81
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.163.95.196
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1092374088 11789 127.0.0.1 (13 Aug 2004 05:14:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: (e-mail address removed)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 05:14:48 +0000 (UTC)
Path:
cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!news-out.cwi
x.com!news-out!newsfeed.cwix.com!easynet-monga!easynet.net!news.glorb.com!po
stnews2.google.com!not-for-mail
Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols:11074
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols

Hi Jim,

Thanks for writing, but I qouted tree control just as example, infact
I wanted to know that on the helm of .NET framework, which would be
obviously installed on client machine as well, can I enjoy the
flexibillity that AxtiveX controls provide while programming, without
using them?

Is Microsoft looking to extend the IE Web Controls package, so that
developers may have some more controls to play with, on client side,
without bothering the bandwidth consupmtion caused by downloading
activex controls? Or if there exists some abstraction for Web Controls
( like Tree Control, or Toolbar control )that a developer can inherit
to develop some custom controls, like developing a Web Control (and
not an ActiveX one) to play a ticker for news which are being updated
on the timeout of a minute from a data source on my web-server???
(again this is just an example and not my requirement :)

Looking forward ...

Regards
Muhammad Shuaib


(e-mail address removed) (Jim Cheshire [MSFT]) wrote in message
Hi Muhammad,

There are a ton of TreeView controls for ASP.NET, including one that we
have in the IE Webcontrols package. (Our is not supported by us, but
it
is
available on www.asp.net.)

Jim Cheshire [MSFT]
MCP+I, MCSE, MCSD, MCDBA
Microsoft Developer Support
(e-mail address removed)

This post is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties and confers no rights.
on
web???
Date: 11 Aug 2004 22:29:45 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.163.95.196
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1092288585 8775 127.0.0.1 (12 Aug 2004 05:29:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: (e-mail address removed)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 05:29:45 +0000 (UTC)
Path:
cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.s ul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!proxad.net!postnews2.google.
com!not-for-mail
Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols:11065
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols

Hi,

Is there any mechanism in .NET Framework which can help me to replace
activex controls on my web page??

As activex controls need to be downloaded on the client machine, and
my clients are not interested in downloading any such binaries to
their machines for a bunch of reasons, including the consumption of
bandwidth as a strong one.

Like, by the virtue of .NET framework, can I acheive the functionality
of a "Tree Control" on my web page, without using/downloading the
ActiveX Tree Control??

Looking forward ...

Regards,
Muhammad Shuaib
 
M

Muhammad Shuaib Anjum

Hello Jim,

Thanx for writing.

While surfing the web, in the same context as of this thread, I came
across something interesting: Smart Clients.

http://msdn.microsoft.com/smartclient/
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnpag/html/scag.asp

I am having some time reading it, but see if you can provide some
insight of how to compare it with Thin Client and Rich Client as it
says. Though the text on the above links says that it provides a
middle layer, which combines features of both Thin & Rich Cleints, but
still I am not clear about it.

Looking forward ...

Regards,
Muhammad Shuaib.




Muhammad,

What you are asking is not possible. You have an ActiveX control that runs
on the client. In order for that to happen, the control has to be
downloaded to the client.

You want to replace that with a control in .NET that provides for the same
functionality and is a thin-client with no postback. Therefore, you have
to download something to the client that will provide that. However, your
requirement is that you remove the reliance on downloading anything.

There is no way to do this.

Jim Cheshire [MSFT]
MCP+I, MCSE, MCSD, MCDBA
Microsoft Developer Support
(e-mail address removed)

This post is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties and confers no rights.

--------------------
From: (e-mail address removed) (Muhammad Shuaib Anjum)
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols
Subject: Re: Does .NET provide any mechanism to replace ActiveX controls on web???
Date: 15 Aug 2004 00:04:21 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 161
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.82.53.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1092553462 17782 127.0.0.1 (15 Aug 2004 07:04:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: (e-mail address removed)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 07:04:22 +0000 (UTC)
Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.s
ul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!p
ostnews2.google.com!not-for-mail
Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols:11095
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols

Hi Jim,

Well being specific is that my company already have a browser-based
client which runs an activex in the browser window, to provide
interactive UI to the user. But by the virtue of activex :(, it takes
a bunch of bandwidth, while downloading to users's machine.

What we are looking foroward is to see if .NET Framework provide some
magic which can be used to replace our ActiveX, and hence save user's
bandwidth, without sacrificing any functionality. Obviously there can
be some compromise but that should b minimized to 1-5 %.

See if you can provide some details, or as you said you are not an
expert of this, see if you can name somebody from Microsoft, who can
be helpful in this regard.

Looking forward ...

Regards,
Muhammad Shuaib.


(e-mail address removed) (Jim Cheshire [MSFT]) wrote in message
Muhammad,

You need to be more specific in order for me to give you more specifics,
but I will say that you can use Windows Forms controls hosted in Internet
Explorer if you wish. The stipulation is that the .NET Framework exists on
the client, and there is some minor configuration required for the runtime
security policy in order to make it work correctly.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;305624

Keep in mind that this is outside of my area of expertise. I'm not a
client-side guy.

Are we looking to extend the Web controls package? Kind of and kind of
not. We are not going to extend what you currently have, but we have added
a whole slew of very cool controls to Visual Studio .NET 2005, some of
which are the same control types that you have available to you in the
current Web controls.

Jim Cheshire [MSFT]
MCP+I, MCSE, MCSD, MCDBA
Microsoft Developer Support
(e-mail address removed)

This post is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties and confers no rights.
controls
on web???
Date: 12 Aug 2004 22:14:20 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 81
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.163.95.196
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1092374088 11789 127.0.0.1 (13 Aug 2004 05:14:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: (e-mail address removed)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 05:14:48 +0000 (UTC)
Path:
cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!news-out.cwi
x.com!news-out!newsfeed.cwix.com!easynet-monga!easynet.net!news.glorb.com!po
stnews2.google.com!not-for-mail
Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols:11074
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols

Hi Jim,

Thanks for writing, but I qouted tree control just as example, infact
I wanted to know that on the helm of .NET framework, which would be
obviously installed on client machine as well, can I enjoy the
flexibillity that AxtiveX controls provide while programming, without
using them?

Is Microsoft looking to extend the IE Web Controls package, so that
developers may have some more controls to play with, on client side,
without bothering the bandwidth consupmtion caused by downloading
activex controls? Or if there exists some abstraction for Web Controls
( like Tree Control, or Toolbar control )that a developer can inherit
to develop some custom controls, like developing a Web Control (and
not an ActiveX one) to play a ticker for news which are being updated
on the timeout of a minute from a data source on my web-server???
(again this is just an example and not my requirement :)

Looking forward ...

Regards
Muhammad Shuaib


(e-mail address removed) (Jim Cheshire [MSFT]) wrote in message
Hi Muhammad,

There are a ton of TreeView controls for ASP.NET, including one that we
have in the IE Webcontrols package. (Our is not supported by us, but
it
is
available on www.asp.net.)

Jim Cheshire [MSFT]
MCP+I, MCSE, MCSD, MCDBA
Microsoft Developer Support
(e-mail address removed)

This post is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties and confers no rights.
on
web???
Date: 11 Aug 2004 22:29:45 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.163.95.196
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1092288585 8775 127.0.0.1 (12 Aug 2004 05:29:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: (e-mail address removed)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 05:29:45 +0000 (UTC)
Path:

cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.s

ul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!proxad.net!postnews2.google.
com!not-for-mail
Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols:11065
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols

Hi,

Is there any mechanism in .NET Framework which can help me to replace
activex controls on my web page??

As activex controls need to be downloaded on the client machine, and
my clients are not interested in downloading any such binaries to
their machines for a bunch of reasons, including the consumption of
bandwidth as a strong one.

Like, by the virtue of .NET framework, can I acheive the functionality
of a "Tree Control" on my web page, without using/downloading the
ActiveX Tree Control??

Looking forward ...

Regards,
Muhammad Shuaib
 
J

Jim Cheshire [MSFT]

Hi Muhammad,

I'm not familiar with Smart Clients. I know of the existence of this
technology, but I'm no expert in them.

Jim Cheshire [MSFT]
MCP+I, MCSE, MCSD, MCDBA
Microsoft Developer Support
(e-mail address removed)

This post is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties and confers no rights.

--------------------
From: (e-mail address removed) (Muhammad Shuaib Anjum)
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols
Subject: Re: Does .NET provide any mechanism to replace ActiveX controls on web???
Date: 19 Aug 2004 22:05:21 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 251
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.163.95.196
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1092978321 12995 127.0.0.1 (20 Aug 2004 05:05:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: (e-mail address removed)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 05:05:21 +0000 (UTC)
Path: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTFEED01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.s
ul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!p
ostnews2.google.com!not-for-mail
Xref: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols:11124
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols

Hello Jim,

Thanx for writing.

While surfing the web, in the same context as of this thread, I came
across something interesting: Smart Clients.

http://msdn.microsoft.com/smartclient/
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnpag/html /scag.asp

I am having some time reading it, but see if you can provide some
insight of how to compare it with Thin Client and Rich Client as it
says. Though the text on the above links says that it provides a
middle layer, which combines features of both Thin & Rich Cleints, but
still I am not clear about it.

Looking forward ...

Regards,
Muhammad Shuaib.




(e-mail address removed) (Jim Cheshire [MSFT]) wrote in message
Muhammad,

What you are asking is not possible. You have an ActiveX control that runs
on the client. In order for that to happen, the control has to be
downloaded to the client.

You want to replace that with a control in .NET that provides for the same
functionality and is a thin-client with no postback. Therefore, you have
to download something to the client that will provide that. However, your
requirement is that you remove the reliance on downloading anything.

There is no way to do this.

Jim Cheshire [MSFT]
MCP+I, MCSE, MCSD, MCDBA
Microsoft Developer Support
(e-mail address removed)

This post is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties and confers no rights.

--------------------
From: (e-mail address removed) (Muhammad Shuaib Anjum)
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols
Subject: Re: Does .NET provide any mechanism to replace ActiveX
controls
on web???
Date: 15 Aug 2004 00:04:21 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 161
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.82.53.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1092553462 17782 127.0.0.1 (15 Aug 2004 07:04:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: (e-mail address removed)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 07:04:22 +0000 (UTC)
Path:
cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.s
ul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!p
ostnews2.google.com!not-for-mail
Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols:11095
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols

Hi Jim,

Well being specific is that my company already have a browser-based
client which runs an activex in the browser window, to provide
interactive UI to the user. But by the virtue of activex :(, it takes
a bunch of bandwidth, while downloading to users's machine.

What we are looking foroward is to see if .NET Framework provide some
magic which can be used to replace our ActiveX, and hence save user's
bandwidth, without sacrificing any functionality. Obviously there can
be some compromise but that should b minimized to 1-5 %.

See if you can provide some details, or as you said you are not an
expert of this, see if you can name somebody from Microsoft, who can
be helpful in this regard.

Looking forward ...

Regards,
Muhammad Shuaib.


(e-mail address removed) (Jim Cheshire [MSFT]) wrote in message
Muhammad,

You need to be more specific in order for me to give you more specifics,
but I will say that you can use Windows Forms controls hosted in Internet
Explorer if you wish. The stipulation is that the .NET Framework
exists
on
the client, and there is some minor configuration required for the runtime
security policy in order to make it work correctly.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;305624

Keep in mind that this is outside of my area of expertise. I'm not a
client-side guy.

Are we looking to extend the Web controls package? Kind of and kind of
not. We are not going to extend what you currently have, but we have added
a whole slew of very cool controls to Visual Studio .NET 2005, some of
which are the same control types that you have available to you in the
current Web controls.

Jim Cheshire [MSFT]
MCP+I, MCSE, MCSD, MCDBA
Microsoft Developer Support
(e-mail address removed)

This post is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties and confers no rights.
controls
on web???
Date: 12 Aug 2004 22:14:20 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 81
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.163.95.196
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1092374088 11789 127.0.0.1 (13 Aug 2004 05:14:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: (e-mail address removed)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 05:14:48 +0000 (UTC)
Path:
cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!news-out.cwi x.com!news-out!newsfeed.cwix.com!easynet-monga!easynet.net!news.glorb.com!po
stnews2.google.com!not-for-mail
Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols:11074
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols

Hi Jim,

Thanks for writing, but I qouted tree control just as example, infact
I wanted to know that on the helm of .NET framework, which would be
obviously installed on client machine as well, can I enjoy the
flexibillity that AxtiveX controls provide while programming, without
using them?

Is Microsoft looking to extend the IE Web Controls package, so that
developers may have some more controls to play with, on client side,
without bothering the bandwidth consupmtion caused by downloading
activex controls? Or if there exists some abstraction for Web Controls
( like Tree Control, or Toolbar control )that a developer can inherit
to develop some custom controls, like developing a Web Control (and
not an ActiveX one) to play a ticker for news which are being updated
on the timeout of a minute from a data source on my web-server???
(again this is just an example and not my requirement :)

Looking forward ...

Regards
Muhammad Shuaib


(e-mail address removed) (Jim Cheshire [MSFT]) wrote in message
Hi Muhammad,

There are a ton of TreeView controls for ASP.NET, including one
that
we
have in the IE Webcontrols package. (Our is not supported by us,
but
it
is
available on www.asp.net.)

Jim Cheshire [MSFT]
MCP+I, MCSE, MCSD, MCDBA
Microsoft Developer Support
(e-mail address removed)

This post is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties and confers no rights.
controls
on
web???
Date: 11 Aug 2004 22:29:45 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.163.95.196
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1092288585 8775 127.0.0.1 (12 Aug
2004
05:29:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: (e-mail address removed)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 05:29:45 +0000 (UTC)
Path:
cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.s ul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!proxad.net!postnews2.google.
com!not-for-mail
Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols:11065
microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols

Hi,

Is there any mechanism in .NET Framework which can help me to replace
activex controls on my web page??

As activex controls need to be downloaded on the client machine, and
my clients are not interested in downloading any such binaries to
their machines for a bunch of reasons, including the consumption of
bandwidth as a strong one.

Like, by the virtue of .NET framework, can I acheive the functionality
of a "Tree Control" on my web page, without using/downloading the
ActiveX Tree Control??

Looking forward ...

Regards,
Muhammad Shuaib
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
473,768
Messages
2,569,574
Members
45,048
Latest member
verona

Latest Threads

Top