S
sasan
I need a good software for ruby programming. please post message for
me about the ruby software.
me about the ruby software.
M
Mario Camou
[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]
I use Emacs and NetBeans
-Mario.
I use Emacs and NetBeans
-Mario.
M
Michael Brooks
Hello Sasan:
I use TurboRuby ( http://www.embarcadero.com/products/turboruby ). It costs
$49~ CND after the trial expires but that's worth it to me. I've used many
other IDE's and editors but like this the best for my needs. There's also a
Rails specific version called 3rdRail (
http://www.embarcadero.com/products/3rdrail ).
Michael
----- Original Message -----
From: "sasan" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 12:26 PM
Subject: Ruby Editor
I use TurboRuby ( http://www.embarcadero.com/products/turboruby ). It costs
$49~ CND after the trial expires but that's worth it to me. I've used many
other IDE's and editors but like this the best for my needs. There's also a
Rails specific version called 3rdRail (
http://www.embarcadero.com/products/3rdrail ).
Michael
----- Original Message -----
From: "sasan" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 12:26 PM
Subject: Ruby Editor
B
Brad Mr
sasan said:
Have not used this. but looks good.
http://www.jetbrains.com/ruby/index.html
Also just used Aptana in the past, or Text Mate
http://aptana.com/
http://macromates.com/
B
Bertram Scharpf
Am Sonntag, 23. Aug 2009, 03:30:44 +0900 schrieb sasan:
Vim?
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/328397
Vim?
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/328397
R
Robert Dober
What else?
Sorry could not resist!
R.
M
Marcos Vanetta
[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]
gedit like textmate
http://blog.nationcode.com/articles/2008/04/06/gedit-como-textmate-mejorado-para-rails-en-gnu-linux
http://joselo.wordpress.com/2007/03/28/textmate-en-linux/
saludos
gedit like textmate
http://blog.nationcode.com/articles/2008/04/06/gedit-como-textmate-mejorado-para-rails-en-gnu-linux
http://joselo.wordpress.com/2007/03/28/textmate-en-linux/
saludos
B
Brian Candler
sasan said:
Depends what platform you are on.
If you are on Windows, there was a recent thread listing a lot of
options:
http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/193184
D
darkintent
[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]
My favorite is Emacs, but Netbeans is good too especially if you are on
Windows where Emacs just does not quite fit.
My favorite is Emacs, but Netbeans is good too especially if you are on
Windows where Emacs just does not quite fit.
N
Nathan Keel
sasan said:
vi/vim has both *nix and Windows, it's free, has been around forever and
is powerful.
A
Aaron Turner
edlin! Uses less resources then any of the other editors people have
suggested. As a bonus, you'll learn very quickly not to make
mistakes.
--
Aaron Turner
http://synfin.net/
http://tcpreplay.synfin.net/ - Pcap editing and replay tools for Unix & Windows
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
-- Benjamin Franklin
N
Nathan Keel
Aaron said:edlin! Uses less resources then any of the other editors people have
suggested. As a bonus, you'll learn very quickly not to make
mistakes.
Never heard of that? Anyway, any text editor will work, but things like
vi/vim, gedit, etc. (free on Linux, and vim works on Windows), will
work fine. I guess it might depend on your OS.
M
Michael W. Ryder
Personally I preferred UCEdit, University of Calgary Editor, but it onlyAaron said:edlin! Uses less resources then any of the other editors people have
suggested. As a bonus, you'll learn very quickly not to make
mistakes.
ran on a CDC Cyber series as far as I know. I loved being able to go to
the 234th instance of 'the' and changing the next 5 instances to 'then'
in a file with a single command. It made editing large files very easy.
Unfortunately I have never seen any editor close to it even though I
used it in the late 70's.
B
Bertram Scharpf
Hi,
Am Freitag, 28. Aug 2009, 04:15:06 +0900 schrieb Nathan Keel:
Vim is sure a matter of taste. I know that because I refused it
for a long time. A time much too long...
Bertram
Am Freitag, 28. Aug 2009, 04:15:06 +0900 schrieb Nathan Keel:
Vim is sure a matter of taste. I know that because I refused it
for a long time. A time much too long...
Bertram
R
Robert Dober
Now this is subtle lobbying
. But I am with you of course.OTOH if you do not try out emacs you will never know what you like better.
And IIRC there are simply no other choices (1)(unless on MAC)
.R.
(1) For editors, IDEs are a different history that shall be told a
different time.
K
Kevin
[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]
I can't say I disagree, but I do like being able to control mpd and read
PDF's inside Emacs. Not to mention Emacs' ability to run as a daemon.
I can't say I disagree, but I do like being able to control mpd and read
PDF's inside Emacs. Not to mention Emacs' ability to run as a daemon.
H
Hunt Jon
Is it possible to add some text editors information on Ruby's official website?
I'm kind of tired of this kind of discussion unless something notable comes up.
I'm kind of tired of this kind of discussion unless something notable comes up.
R
Robert Dober
Yeah but what shall we say to a newbie?
R.
M
Martin DeMello
point him to the wiki!
martin
R
Robert Dober
ok I'll cross the i's and point the t's
Sorry if you are tired about vim vs. emacs but that is somehow a "natural law".
What else shall we say than: Try vim, try emacs, try <fill in
yourself> choose what suits you better. The wiki pointing idea itself
has not been accepted so far. I suggested a Wiki for FAQs for
netiquette, but that point did not find any echo at all. I doubt it
will for the editor, but maybe ( and I would not mind at all ) I am
wrong.
Cheers
R.