Why is the last value used to detect the rising edge

[fl]

Hi,
I see the following in a VHDL book and some web tutorial. It is used
to detect clk rising edge.
-----------------
if clk'event and clk'value='1' and clk'last_value='0'
then ...
-- to detect setup time
------------------
I think if clk'event(true) and clk'value='1', then clk'last_value will
be '0' unconditionally. That is, "clk'last_value='0'" is redundant. Is
it?








My question is a lot of process only uses the following to write clk
rising edge:


process (clk)
begin
if clk'event and clk='1'

end process;

I am confused with the above two usage.
Could you explain it for me? Thanks a lot.

 

[kennheinrich]

Hi,
I see the following in a VHDL book and some web tutorial. It is used
to detect clk rising edge.
-----------------
if clk'event and clk'value='1' and clk'last_value='0'
then ...
-- to detect setup time
------------------
I think if clk'event(true) and clk'value='1', then clk'last_value will
be '0' unconditionally. That is, "clk'last_value='0'" is redundant. Is
it?

My question is a lot of process only uses the following to write clk
rising edge:

process (clk)
begin
if clk'event and clk='1'

end process;

I am confused with the above two usage.
Could you explain it for me? Thanks a lot.

Redundant? It depends on what the type of the clk signal is. If it's a
std_logic, then the check for '0' is *not* redundant. A signal of
type std_logic can have nine different values ('X', '0', '1', 'L',
'H', 'Z', etc). The check for '0' will, in simulation at least, cause
the code inside the "if" statement only to run on a clean 0-to-1
transition. It would be ignored on, for example, an 'X' to '1'
transition. On the other hand, if the signal is of type "bit", which
only has values '0' and '1', then it *is* redundant.

In a more practical sense, though, synthesizers (as opposed to
simulators) will treat the second form (clk'event and clk='1') as a
shorthand for referring to the regular rising edge clock of a real
hardware flip-flop, and ignore any nuances about nine-level
enumerations. For synthesis, I'd think of the clk'last_value='0' term
as redundant, and possibly even confusing to a dumber synthesizer.

- Kenn

 

[Peter]

Hi,
I see the following in a VHDL book and some web tutorial. It is used
to detect clk rising edge.
-----------------
if clk'event and clk'value='1' and clk'last_value='0'
then ...
-- to detect setup time
------------------
I think if clk'event(true) and clk'value='1', then clk'last_value will
be '0' unconditionally. That is, "clk'last_value='0'" is redundant. Is
it?

My question is a lot of process only uses the following to write clk
rising edge:

process (clk)
begin
if clk'event and clk='1'

end process;

I am confused with the above two usage.
Could you explain it for me? Thanks a lot.

Use rising_edge(clk) instead.

/Peter

 

[LittleAlex]

I think if clk'event(true) and clk'value='1', then clk'last_value will
be '0' unconditionally. That is, "clk'last_value='0'" is redundant. Is
it?

No. The 1st clock will have clk'last_value='U'.

There is probably some initialization that needs to occur.

Alex

 

[Andy]

I see the following in a VHDL book and some web tutorial.

Unfortunately there are a ton of books and tutorials that still use
archaic means of detecting the rising or falling edge of clocks. It
was only 15 years ago that standard functions rising_edge() and
falling_edge() were incorporated into the IEEE standard... These
functions correctly detect transitions to and from L and H also.

If, on the other hand, your example uses type bit/bit_vector, I don't
think these functions are defined for that data type, and the check
for last_value='0' is completely redundant.

Andy