G
George Orwell
Barry said:
If you mean one correction for you and Mark, well, I didn't
count a single correction at all before I posted. Contrast this
with what happens when I make outlandish statements, such as
saying that C99 was written by Microsoft and Intel or that
windows.h is a standard header.
If you mean one correction for me, well, you're wrong, because
what I said is right.
Your original statement:
"By the way, to get the precision you asked for, CLOCKS_PER_SEC on your
system must be at least 10,000."
Anyone who knows C knows that your statement above is incorrect. This
has been discussed on this newsgroup countless times in the past, and
Lawrence Kirby even wrote half a page about it.
It's funny how the "regulars" on this newsgroup pile on and nitpick
when it's a "troll" or outsider who says something like that, but
when it comes to one of their own (e.g., Mark, Barry) who are the
dogs of war for the "trolls"... *crickets*
That is one of the many reasons I gave up taking a serious approach
to this newsgroup. The group used to be about what was said, not
who was saying it. Nowadays the group is nothing more than a
personality cult and a haven for Net Nannying hypocrites. So I'd
rather use the group for my own amusement and to pick up the odd
C fact here and there.
Yours,
Han from China
Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it