Yes, that's why I attached both the two articles in my message. But thanks
also for your kind remind Juan,
Regards,
Steven Cheng
Microsoft Online Support
Get Secure!
www.microsoft.com/security
(This posting is provided "AS IS", with no warranties, and confers no
rights.)
--------------------
| From: "Juan T. Llibre" <
[email protected]>
| References: <
[email protected]>
<
[email protected]>
| Subject: Re: Where did my ASP.NET dll go in ASP.NET 2.0?
| Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 08:18:16 -0400
| Lines: 109
| X-Priority: 3
| X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.1830
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830
| X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
| Message-ID: <
[email protected]>
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
| NNTP-Posting-Host: 222stb33.codetel.net.do 64.32.114.222
| Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl
| Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet:120870
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
|
| Just one warning to all regarding :
|
| > #Inside the ASP.NET 2.0 Code Compilation Model
| >
http://www.codeguru.com/columns/Experts/article.php/c5365/
|
| That article was written for Beta 1 of the .Net Framework/ASP.NET 2.0.
|
| There were a few changes between
| Beta 1 and Beta 2 which affect that article's precision.
|
| For example, the article says that "There is a new feature in ASP.NET 2.0
| that lets you put all related code in a subdirectory called Code."
|
| In Beta 2, that subdirectory's name was changed to "App_Code".
|
| There's other changes and updated info in these two articles :
|
|
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnvs05/html
/internals.asp
|
|
http://www.15seconds.com/issue/050428.htm
|
|
|
|
| Juan T. Llibre
| ASP.NET MVP
|
http://asp.net.do/foros/
| Foros de ASP.NET en Español
| Ven, y hablemos de ASP.NET...
| ======================
|
| | > Hi Otis,
| >
| > Welcome to ASP.NET newsgroup.
| > As for the new behaviors you met when developing asp.net app under the
2.0
| > enviornment, here are some of my understandings:
| >
| > 1. Yes, for ASP.NET 2.0 web application, it is no longer a project, but
be
| > refered as "web site" which is called "projectless". This feature has
| > serveral benifits such as:
| >
| > 1) we no longer need to worry about the corruption of any VS.NET IDE
| > specific files such as .csproj or webinfo or... . In 1.x project, when
some
| > of these files get damaged, we will get many unexpected problems when
| > opening or developing the project.
| >
| > 2) When using the projectless model, in some team dev scenario, we no
| > longer need to care about such IDE specific files when using source
control
| > system to check in/ check out items.
| >
| > #Projectless Web Projects in VS.NET 2005
| >
http://geekswithblogs.net/joelross/archive/2005/08/11/49953.aspx
| >
| >
| > 2.For the
| > =========
| > more importantly I can't find the dll for the
| > latest compiled of the web site
| > ==========
| >
| > this is another new feature of the ASP.NET2.0 's compilation model----
| > purely dynamic compiling... In asp.net 1.x all the code behind
classes or
| > other components classes should be precompiled before being used at
| > runtime, that's why we will find the application's main dll in the "bin"
| > folder when we build our ASP.NET 1.X project in VS.NET IDE.
| > In ASP.NET 2.0, we have the new dynamic compilation model, in such
model,
| > we can put all the codebehind page class's source file (without
| > precompiled) in the project folder and let the asp.net runtime
dynamically
| > compile them at runtime. Also, for other helper component classes, we
can
| > also make them utilize this feature, as long as we put them into those
| > well-known dynamic compile folders (such as App_Code and its child
dirs
| > which can be confgured in web.config). In addition to this fully
dynamic
| > compiled(no precompiled model), we can also use a "fully precompiled"
| > model, in which we precompiled all the components (even the dynamic
pages
| > which used to be compiled when the client user requestthe actual page),
| > that means we could deploy the project without any source code and aspx
| > content.
| > For detailed reference, you can have a look on the following
articles
both
| > the below 2 articles are important since the compilation model has
changed
| > from beta1 to beta2):
| >
| > #Inside the ASP.NET 2.0 Code Compilation Model
| >
http://www.codeguru.com/columns/Experts/article.php/c5365/
| >
| > #Update on changes for Beta 2
| >
http://msdn.microsoft.com/asp.net/whidbey/beta2update.aspx
| >
| > And here is the ASP.NET2.0 QUICK START site:
| >
| >
http://beta.asp.net/QUICKSTART/aspnet/
| >
| > Hope also helps. Thanks,
| >
| > Steven Cheng
| > Microsoft Online Support
|
| > --------------------
| > | From: Otis Mukinfus <
[email protected]>
| > | Subject: Where did my ASP.NET dll go in ASP.NET 2.0?
| > | Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 16:55:41 -0500
| > |
| > | I've just been playing around with ASP.NET 2.0 and first I noticed
it's
| > not really a project any more, but more importantly I can't find the
dll for
| > the latest compiled of the web site. What gives?
| > | Otis
|
|
|
